Close
Help
Need Help?



The Importance of Amino-terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Testing in Clinical Cardiology

Submit a Paper


Libertas Analytics


1461 Article Views

Publication Date: 07 Feb 2007

Journal: Biomarker Insights 2006:1 143-155

BMI
journal

225,023 Article Views

2,778,500 Libertas Article Views

More Statistics

Abstract R. R. J. van Kimmenade1 and J. L. Januzzi Jr2

1Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands; 2Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Introduction

In 1981 de Bold et al. reported that the injection of atrial tissue extracts in rats induced natriuresis, a discovery that initiated a flurry of research leading to the discovery of a new class of cardiac hormones, the natriuretic peptides. These peptides represent the first line of response of the heart to defend the body against a number of processes, especially plasma volume expansion. Since circulating concentrations of natriuretic peptides are elevated in heart failure (HF) and given that clinical parameters for the evaluation and management of HF have a poor sensitivity and specificity, these peptides were a more than welcome addition to standard clinical evaluation, as a marker to identify HF. Nowadays, Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) and its cleavage equivalent aminoterminal proBNP (NT-proBNP) have proven its clinical diagnostic but also prognostic value in HF, and have shown to be superior as a diagnostic parameter for HF when compared to chest X-ray and parameters of physical examination. In this paper, we aim to discuss the background, the value, and of course the potential pitfalls encountered by clinicians using NT-proBNP testing in their daily clinical practice.


Post a Comment

x close

Discussion Add A Comment
No comments yet...Be the first to comment.


share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (Average 3 Weeks)
  • Fair & Constructive Peer Review
  • Professional Author Service
  • High Visibility
  • High Readership
  • What Our Authors Say

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers. RSS Feeds Email Alerts Twitter

BROWSE CATEGORIES
Our Testimonials
I had an excellent experience publishing our review article in Clinical Medicine Reviews.  The managing editor was very helpful and the process was very timely and transparent.
Professor Jonathan A. Bernstein (University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Division of Immunology, Allergy Section, Cincinnati, OH, USA) What our authors say