Close
Help
Need Help?



Long-Term Clinical Outcome after Sirolimus-Stent Implantation for in Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Restenosis

Submit a Paper


Libertas Analytics


1776 Article Views

Publication Date: 16 Apr 2008

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology Clinical Medicine: Cardiology 2008:2 161-163

CMIcar
journal

112,118 Article Views

3,517,287 Libertas Article Views

More Statistics

Abstract Alain Guidon, Stéphane Cook, Alexandre Berger and Jean-Jacques Goy

Service de cardiologie, Clinique Cecil, Lausanne, Switzerland. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

Abstract

Restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) remains a clinical problem. We report our experience with the use a second SES in the fi rst SES to treat in-SES restenosis. Twenty-seven patients with in-SES restenosis were included in the registry. In-SES restenosis was focal in 34%, diffuse in 59% and proliferative in 7%. The procedure was successful in all patients without any acute in-hospital complications. During a mean follow-up of 14 ± 7 months MACE occurred in 8 patients (30%), (1 death, 1 myocardial infarction, 4 target lesion revascularisation, 1 target vessel revascularisation and 1 patient underwent CABG). Nineteen patients (70%) had an event-free outcome. In conclusion SES placement to treat in-SES is safe and feasible and could be considered as a therapeutic option. However the incidence of MACE remains high on a long-term period. The use of stents has significantly improved the outcome of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) (1,2). However, despite major advances in angioplasty and stenting, in-stent restenosis remains a major limitation. Recently, drug-eluting stents and especially sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) have emerged as a very promising approach in preventing restenosis, and several different compounds have been shown to have a major impact on both the angiographic and the clinical outcome (6–9). However, even after drug eluting stents implantation in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains and represents a clinical challenge. Several approaches have been proposed to deal with ISR like plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), rotational atherectomy, brachytherapy (1–3). Few reports are actually available about the use of SES in SES for ISR treatment. We report our experience about the use SES for treating an ISR after SES implantation.


Post a Comment

x close

Discussion Add A Comment
No comments yet...Be the first to comment.


share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (Average 3 Weeks)
  • Fair & Constructive Peer Review
  • Professional Author Service
  • High Visibility
  • High Readership
  • What Our Authors Say

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers. RSS Feeds Email Alerts Twitter

BROWSE CATEGORIES
Our Testimonials
In my opinion the review process in all the Libertas Academica journals I have had the privilege of reviewing papers for is second to none.  The entire process is a click away and all the editorial staff are very cooperative.  The papers that are submitted are of top quality and I am sure the journals will gain the status of high impact journals in a very short time.
Dr C. Shekhar Mayanil (Children's Memorial Research Center, Chicago, IL, USA) What our authors say