2007 Article Views
Publication Date: 09 Feb 2008
Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology Clinical Medicine: Cardiology 2008:2 7-12
Abstract Abdel-Rauf Zeina1, Uri Rosenschein2, Majed Odeh3 and Elisha Barmeir1
1Department of Radiology and MAR Imaging Institute. 2Department of Cardiology and 3Department of Internal Medicine A, Bnai Zion Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Abstract
Left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis is a high risk subset of coronary artery disease; however, its occurrence may be misjudged by coronary angiography. Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) was performed on 5 patients with clinically highly suspicious and angiographically borderline LMCA disease (ostial: 3 patients, mid: 1 patient and distal: 1 patient). A cross-sectional CCTA image was used to calculate the diameter stenosis. The quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) reference diameter (RD) correlated well with CCTA RD in all 5 patients. However, the lesion site minimal lumen diameter (MLD) by QCA correlated less well with that obtained by CCTA. The grade of stenosis measured by CCTA was significantly lower than that measured by QCA. Morphologically, three patients had LMCA ostial angulation (with minimal atheromatous changes), one patient had a biconcave configuration of the LMCA (with normal vessel wall) and one other had a tapering-morphology of the LMCA (with minimal atheromatous changes). In conclusion, CCTA may have a complementary diagnostic role in patients with angiographically ambiguous or inconclusive LMCA lesions and therefore it should be considered in the assessment of selected patients before they undergo coronary bypass surgery. In order to validate CCTA for main stem stenosis a proper gold standard, such as IVUS, is required.
Discussion
No comments yet...Be the first to comment.
The editorial staff of Biomarkers in Cancer are very efficient and helpful. I am happy to work with them. I look forward to reviewing future manuscripts.Dr Xi Liu (National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) What our authors say
Copyright © 2010 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)