Publication Date: 28 Jan 2010
Type: Review
Journal: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Therapeutics
Citation: Clinical Medicine: Reviews in Therapeutics 2010:2
doi: 10.4137/CMRT.S1609
Serious bacterial infections with their high bioburden are often difficult to treat. Emergence of drug-resistant bacteria has worsened the situation, and management of these cases has become a therapeutic challenge. Prompt institution of appropriate antibiotic is vital in order to decrease complications and fatalities. Cefepime is a new fourth generation parenteral cephalosporin which holds promise for management of these severe infections. It has been shown to be useful in critical pneumonias, soft and bone tissue infections, urinary tract infections and febrile neutropenia. It eradicates organisms which have shown resistance to other β-lactam antibiotics. It is stable to hydrolysis by the common plasmid and chromosomally mediated β-lactamases. The twice daily dosing and improved efficacy even at low dosage makes it a suitable alternative to ceftazidime and carbapenems. It is well tolerated by all age groups and is safe even for newborns. Cefepime monotherapy gives both a good clinical response and an excellent microbiological clearance. In order to preserve its anti-bacterial potency, prudent use of cefepime is warranted. Research into its efficacy and safety with other β-lactamase inhibitors is ongoing and will benefit mankind.
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
We found Bioinformatics and Biology Insights very supportive and quick in guiding us in submitting our manuscript. The review of the manuscript was also very prompt. We also found that the review was fair and prompt and that was the most important thing for us. It was a very interesting experience for us. We also liked the video abstract service, which is very novel and encouraging for authors.
All authors are surveyed after their articles are published. Authors are asked to rate their experience in a variety of areas, and their responses help us to monitor our performance. Presented here are their responses in some key areas. No 'poor' or 'very poor' responses were received; these are represented in the 'other' category.See Our Results
Copyright © 2013 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube