2935 Article Views
Publication Date: 06 Oct 2008
Journal: Evolutionary Bioinformatics 2008:4 263-270
Abstract Haseeb A. Khan, Ibrahim A. Arif, Ali H. Bahkali, Ahmad H. Al Farhan and Ali A. Al Homaidan
Molecular Fingerprinting and Biodiversity Unit, Prince Sultan Research Chair Program in Environment and Wildlife, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
This investigation was aimed to compare the inference of antelope phylogenies resulting from the 16S rRNA, cytochrome-b (cyt-b) and d-loop segments of mitochondrial DNA using three different computational models including Bayesian (BA), maximum parsimony (MP) and unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA). The respective nucleotide sequences of three Oryx species (Oryx leucoryx, Oryx dammah and Oryx gazella) and an out-group (Addax nasomaculatus) were aligned and subjected to BA, MP and UPGMA models for comparing the topologies of respective phylogenetic trees. The 16S rRNA region possessed the highest frequency of conserved sequences (97.65%) followed by cyt-b (94.22%) and d-loop (87.29%). There were few transitions (2.35%) and none transversions in 16S rRNA as compared to cyt-b (5.61% transitions and 0.17% transversions) and d-loop (11.57% transitions and 1.14% transversions) while com- paring the four taxa. All the three mitochondrial segments clearly differentiated the genus Addax from Oryx using the BA or UPGMA models. The topologies of all the gamma-corrected Bayesian trees were identical irrespective of the marker type. The UPGMA trees resulting from 16S rRNA and d-loop sequences were also identical (Oryx dammah grouped with Oryx leucoryx) to Bayesian trees except that the UPGMA tree based on cyt-b showed a slightly different phylogeny (Oryx dammah grouped with Oryx gazella) with a low bootstrap support. However, the MP model failed to differentiate the genus Addax from Oryx. These findings demonstrate the efficiency and robustness of BA and UPGMA methods for phylogenetic analysis of antelopes using mitochondrial markers.
Discussion
No comments yet...Be the first to comment.
I had an excellent experience publishing our review article in Clinical Medicine Reviews. The managing editor was very helpful and the process was very timely and transparent.Professor Jonathan A. Bernstein (University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Division of Immunology, Allergy Section, Cincinnati, OH, USA) What our authors say
Copyright © 2010 Libertas Academica Ltd (except open access articles and accompanying metadata and supplementary files.)