Close
Help
Need Help?



A Practical Multifaceted Approach to Selecting Differentially Expressed Genes

Submit a Paper


Libertas Press Analytics


1520 Article Views

Publication Date: 15 Jan 2008

Journal: Cancer Informatics 2007:3 203-212

CI
journal

275,721 Article Views

2,621,677 Libertas Article Views

More Statistics

Abstract Yingye Zheng1 and Margaret Pepe1,2

1Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue N., M2-B232 Seattle, WA 98109. 2Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Box 357232 Seattle, WA 98195.

Abstract:

Consider a gene expression array study comparing two groups of subjects where the goal is to explore a large number of genes in order to select for further investigation a subset that appear to be differently expressed. There has been much statistical research into the development of formal methods for designating genes as differentially expressed. These procedures control error rates such as the false detection rate or family wise error rate. We contend however that other statistical considerations are also relevant to the task of gene selection. These include the extent of differential expression and the strength of evidence for differential expression at a gene. Using real and simulated data we first demonstrate that a proper exploratory analysis should evaluate these aspects as well as decision rules that control error rates. We propose a new measure called the mp-value that quantifies strength of evidence for differential expression. The mp-values are calculated with a resampling based algorithm taking into account the multiplicity and dependence encountered in microarray data. In contrast to traditional p-values our mp-values do not depend on specification of a decision rule for their definition. They are simply descriptive in nature. We contrast the mp-values with multiple testing p-values in the context of data from a breast cancer prognosis study and from a simulation model.


Post a Comment

x close

Discussion Add A Comment
No comments yet...Be the first to comment.


share on

Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing (Average 3 Weeks)
  • Fair & Constructive Peer Review
  • Professional Author Service
  • High Visibility
  • High Readership
  • What Our Authors Say

Quick Links

Follow Us We make it easy to find new research papers. RSS Feeds Email Alerts Twitter

BROWSE CATEGORIES
Our Testimonials
I had an excellent experience publishing our review article in Clinical Medicine Reviews.  The managing editor was very helpful and the process was very timely and transparent.
Professor Jonathan A. Bernstein (University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Division of Immunology, Allergy Section, Cincinnati, OH, USA) What our authors say