Close
Help




JOURNAL

Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Synonymous Codon Usage Bias in the Plastid Genome is Unrelated to Gene Structure and Shows Evolutionary Heterogeneity

Submit a Paper


Evolutionary Bioinformatics 2015:11 65-77

Original Research

Published on 07 Apr 2015

DOI: 10.4137/EBO.S22566


Further metadata provided in PDF



Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Evolutionary Bioinformatics

Abstract

Synonymous codon usage bias (SCUB) is the nonuniform usage of codons, occurring often in nearly all organisms. Our previous study found that SCUB is correlated with intron number, is unequal among exons in the plant nuclear genome, and mirrors evolutionary specialization. However, whether this rule exists in the plastid genome has not been addressed. Here, we present an analysis of SCUB in the plastid genomes of 25 species from lower to higher plants (algae, bryophytes, pteridophytes, gymnosperms, and spermatophytes). We found NNA and NNT (A- and T-ending codons) are preferential in the plastid genomes of all plants. Interestingly, this preference is heterogeneous among taxonomies of plants, with the strongest preference in bryophytes and the weakest in pteridophytes, suggesting an association between SCUB and plant evolution. In addition, SCUB frequencies are consistent among genes with varied introns and among exons, indicating that the bias of NNA and NNT is unrelated to either intron number or exon position. Further, SCUB is associated with DNA methylation–induced conversion of cytosine to thymine in the vascular plants but not in algae or bryophytes. These data demonstrate that these SCUB profiles in the plastid genome are distinctly different compared with the nuclear genome.



Downloads

PDF  (2.44 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

Supplementary Files 1  (586.58 KB PDF FORMAT)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing


What Your Colleagues Say About Evolutionary Bioinformatics
This is the fastest progress we have experienced from submission to acceptance.  Reviews are fast, pertinent, and instructive.  Every step of the process is visible and prompt, and every email is friendly and immediate.  In all, it is an excellent experience to be published in Libertas Academica.
Dr Jiang Wang (Sun Yat sen University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube