Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology

2,983 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Sunitinib Efficacy in Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 17 May 2011

Type: Short Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology 2011:3

doi: 10.4137/CMRO.S7198

Abstract

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are relatively rare and generally considered to follow an indolent course. However poorly differentiated or metastatic PNETs can also behave in an aggressive manner with a 5-year survival as low as 30% in non-functioning PNETs. Many therapeutic agents have been tested in the treatment of NET including Interferon alfa, streptozocin or temozolomide-based combination chemotherapy with an objective response of 10%–30%. Moreover these agents are less effective in patients with advanced carcinoid tumors and their prolonged use is often associated with added toxicity. A number of other signaling pathways have also been implicated in neuroendocrine tumors, which also express platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), PDGF receptor (PDGFR), insulin-like growth factor-1, insulin-like growth factor receptor, basic fibroblast growth factor, transforming growth factor, epidermal growth factor receptor, and stem-cell factor receptor.

Sunitinib malate (SUTENT®; Pfizer Oncology) is a small molecule kinase inhibitor with activity against a number of tyrosine kinase receptors, including VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, PDGFR-, PDGFR-, stem-cell factor receptor, glial cell line derived neurotrophic factor receptor and FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3.

This review will present data regarding sunitinib progress in PNET, demonstrating its effectiveness and the emerging hope it may provide for such a disease with limited treatment options.


Downloads

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology
I was requested to contribute a review. The objectives, timelines and process were all extremely reasonable and fit in well with my knowledge base and my work as well as my schedule. The process was quite seamless and no paper was ever exchanged--everything was completed on-line. Thanks for the opportunity to make this contribution.
Dr Michael E. Trigg (North Wales, PA, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube