What Our Peer Reviewers Say

On this page →

Libertas regularly surveys contributors including peer reviewers to ensure we are meeting our high standards.  

Peer reviewers were recently surveyed and were asked to rate their experience in five areas as very good, good, fair, poor or very poor.

  • 93% rated instructions on how to undertake a peer review as good or very good

  • 90% rated their communication with Libertas staff as good or very good

  • 91% rated the accessibility of manuscript files as good or very good

  • 92% rated the interface to upload their peer review report as good or very good

  • 93% rated their over-all experience as a peer reviewer as good or very good

Our Service Promise

  • Efficient Processing: 4 Weeks Average to First Editorial Decision
  • Fair & Independent Expert Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Database Coverage
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
I am happy to provide an endorsement for Journal of Experimental Neuroscience because the editor provided a great deal of flexibility in providing an opportunity to publish.  I must also commend the helpful staff at Libertas who have facilitated the publishing process.
Dr Richard Guy (School of Medical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Australia)
More Testimonials

Quick Links

New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube