Close
Help


To maintain the integrity of peer review Libertas has strict disqualification rules for peer reviewers who are in conflicts of interest or are unqualified to undertake a review.  If you have been asked to peer review a paper you must ensure that you comply with these rules.

You may not undertake a peer review if you are unable to do so objectively.  

If you have agreed to review a paper and subsequently identify a potential conflict of interest, inform jan.mciver @ la-press.com immediately and do not continue your review.  Reviewers in a conflict of interest may not suggest alternative reviewers.

You are deemed to be in a conflict of interest and therefore disqualified from undertaking a peer review if you have, or have had in the past twenty-four months, any commercial associations or financial interests which may be construed as posing a conflict of interest, including but not limited to consultancies, employment, expert testimony, honoraria, retainers, stock holdings or options, and memberships on boards of for-profit organizations with a financial interest in the work under review.

You are deemed to be in a conflict of interest and therefore disqualified from undertaking a peer review if:

  • You have worked at the same institution at any time in the past twenty-four months as an author of the paper under review.

  • You have co-authored a paper, chapter, monograph, abstract or poster with an author of the paper in the past forty-eight months.

You are deemed to be in a conflict of interest and therefore disqualified from undertaking a peer review if:

  • You have a personal social association with an author of the paper under review.

  • You are a family member of any of the authors of the paper under review.

You are disqualified from undertaking a peer review if:

  • You have ever been subject to a professional disciplinary hearing.

  • You are not currently working in the field of the paper under review.

  • You are a member of any journal's editorial board that any of the authors of the paper under review are also members of, or have been in the previous 12 months.

  • You are the Editor in Chief or Associate Editor of the journal to which the paper under review has been submitted.

Our Service Promise

  • Efficient Processing: 4 Weeks Average to First Editorial Decision
  • Fair & Independent Expert Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Database Coverage
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
Working with Libertas Academica was the smoothest publication experience I have had.  The coordinators at Healthy Aging & Clinical Care in the Elderly were consistently available to answer questions and helped my paper progress through the publication stages in a very timely manner.  The reviewers provided excellent suggestions that greatly increased the quality of the paper as well.  This was a fantastic group of individuals with which to work.
Dr Rachel Messer (Oklahoma State University, Tulsa, OK, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube