Clinical Medicine: Pediatrics
Synopsis: An open access, peer reviewed electronic journal that covers diagnosis, management and prevention of conditions specific to childhood and adolescents.
Indexing: 2 major databases. Pubmed indexing for NIH-funded research.
Processing time: Decision in 2 weeks for 90% of papers.
Visibility: Most popular article read 1600+ times.
About this journal
Aims and scope:
Clinical Medicine: Pediatrics is an international, open access, peer reviewed journal which considers manuscripts on all aspects of the diagnosis, management and prevention of disorders specific to children and adolescents, in addition to related genetic, pathophysiological and epidemiological topics.
Editorial standards and procedures:
Submissions, excluding editorials, letters to the editor and dedications, will be peer reviewed by two reviewers. Reviewers are required to provide fair, balanced and constructive reports.
Under our Fairness in Peer Review Policy authors may appeal against reviewers' recommendations which are ill-founded, unobjective or unfair. Appeals are considered by the Editor in Chief or Associate Editor.
Papers are not sent to peer reviewers following submission of a revised manuscript. Editorial decisions on re-submitted papers are based on the author's response to the initial peer review report.
Indexing:
This journal is indexed by:
- Google Scholar
- OAIster
National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy compliant:
As of April 7 2008, the US NIH Public Access Policy requires that all peer reviewed articles resulting from research carried out with NIH funding be deposited in the Pubmed Central archive.
If you are an NIH employee or grantee Libertas Academica will ensure that you comply with the policy by depositing your paper at Pubmed Central on your behalf.
Call for papers:
The Editor in Chief welcomes submissions. Submissions of the following types are invited:
- Original research articles.
- Reviews: comprehensive, authoritative, descriptions of any subject within the journal's scope. They may cover basic science and clinical reviews, ethics, pro/con debates, and equipment reviews.
- Commentaries: focused and opinionated articles on any subject within the journal's scope. These articles are usually related to a contemporary issue.
- Hypotheses: articles that present an original hypothesis backed solely by previously published results rather than any new evidence. They should outline significant progress in thinking that would also be testable.
- Letters to the Editor: these can be either a re-analysis of a previously published article, or a response to such a re-analysis from the authors of the original publication.
- Methodology articles: these discuss a new experimental method, test or procedure. The article must describe a demonstrable advance on what is currently available. The method needs to have been well tested and ideally, but not necessarily, used in a way that proves its value.
- Short reports: brief reports of data from original research.
- Meeting reports: a report pertaining to activity at a meeting or conference Articles published in this journal are immediately available without delay upon publication and enjoy substantial visibility.
- Case reports: reports of clinical cases that can be educational, describe a diagnostic or therapeutic dilemma, suggest an association, or present an important adverse reaction. Case reports must meet appropriate ethical standards.
All submissions are subject to prompt, objective and fair peer review in compliance with our Fairness in Peer Review Policy. Copyright in published articles remains with the author(s). Authors are continually informed of the progress of their paper and our staff are friendly and responsive.
One author recently wrote: "I would like to say that this is the most author-friendly editing process I have experienced in over 150 publications. Thank you most sincerely."
Criteria for publication:
Publication is dependent on peer reviewers' judgement of papers. Reviewers are asked to provide thoughtful and unbiased feedback to authors to ensure that the conclusions of papers are valid and manuscripts achieve reasonable standards of scholarliness and intelligibility.
Previous work in the field must be acknowledged and papers should read without unreasonable difficulty. Papers should fit comfortably within the scope of the journal.
Reviewers are asked to act in a fair, objective and constructive manner which maintains quality standards and helps authors to communicate their research. They are instructed that in areas of genuinely novel research issues may be raised which cannot immediately be resolved and that absolutely rigorous validation of data may therefore not be possible.
More information on the role of peer reviewers is available on the information for reviewers page. Where authors consider that reviewers have made recommendations which are unreasonable, unobjective or ill-founded they may appeal them to the Editor in Chief or Associate Editor under our Fairness in Peer Review Policy.
Articles submitted to other journals:
We are willing to consider papers which have been peer reviewed by other journals but not accepted for publication.
Services for authors:
Prior to peer review of your paper we can:
- Have your paper's reference style revised to meet our requirements,
- Have your paper's English revised by specialist English-speaking technical editors.
After peer review of your paper we can:
- Have your paper revised in accordance with peer reviewer's recommendations and have a summary of responses to the reviewers created by our specialist external substantive editors,
- Provide bound reprints of your article in colour or black and white ,
- Provide online-early rapid publication if your paper prior to typesetting.
What other authors have said:
Libertas Academica actively requests, receives and acts upon feedback from authors, readers and editorial boards. Here's what some recent authors have said about us:
"Within a couple of days the reviewers had been procured and the manuscript was out."
"The communication between your staff and me has been terrific. Whenever progress is made with the manuscript, I receive notice. Quite honestly, I've never had such complete communication with a journal."
"LA is different, and hopefully represents a kind of scientific publication machinery that removes the hurdles from free flow of scientific thought."
Article processing fees:
All submissions to this journal are subject to an article processing fee if they are accepted for publication. Article processing fees are used to fund the processing of your paper and development of the journal. Article processing fees are the only compulsory charge you will face and do not vary according to word count, page count, colour figures or any other factor. There is no additional charge for the author(s) to make any use of their article and no charge to readers to access it.
Full fee waivers are available for authors working in undeveloped nations and partial discounts of 20-50% are available to authors in other nations. Authors must be able to verifiably demonstrate their suitability for a discount or waiver. Availability of waivers and discounts is subject to monthly availability and is given at the publisher's discretion. Waivers and discounts must be applied for prior to submission. Neither are available after submission.
Register as a peer reviewer:
Do you wish to register as a peer reviewer? Or are you already a registered peer reviewer but you need to update your contact details? To register or update your details visit the peer reviewer registration form.
Applicants must be able to demonstrate at least five years of continuous experience in the journal's subject area including at least two in the previous 24 months.
This journal is now indexed by Google Scholar.
Journal newsletter sent to subscribers in week 13, 2009. Register to receive future newsletters.
Journal newsletter sent to subscribers in week 10, 2009. Register to receive future newsletters.
Journal newsletter sent to subscribers in week 9, 2009. Register to receive future newsletters.
Journal newsletter sent to subscribers in week 8, 2009. Register to receive future newsletters.
New call for papers sent to newsletter subscribers in week 7 2009. Readers who wish to be elligible to receive CFPs should subscribe to the newsletter.
Peer reviewers are sought. Click here to apply or to update your details.
No Relation Between Therapeutic Response to Methylphenidate and its Cardiovascular Side Effects in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Venkataramana Bhat, Natalie Grizenko, Steven Sanche and Ridha Joober
Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Montreal, Canada.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the relation between therapeutic response to methylphenidate (MPH) and its associated short term cardiovascular side effects (Systolic Blood Pressure-SBP, Diastolic Blood Pressure-DBP and Heart Rate-HR changes) in children with ADHD, based on the hypothesis that these parameters share common underlying mechanisms.
Method: A double-blind placebo-controlled crossover clinical trial of children 6 to 12 years old diagnosed with ADHD was done. The children were given one week of 0.5 mg/kg MPH and one week of placebo (divided into two equal doses, given twice every day). On the morning of the third day of each week, Blood Pressure (BP) and HR were recorded immediately before (at time 0) and after (at time 10 and 45 minutes ) administration of MPH. Children were grouped into 4 categories according to their therapeutic response (large, moderate, mild or no response) to MPH. A mixed model analysis of variance was performed to determine whether response groups were different with regard to cardiovascular side effects.
Results: All variables were comparable among the four groups 10 min after treatment with MPH and with placebo. Small but significant (p 0.001) increases were seen in SBP (3.65 mm of Hg) and DBP (3.99 mm of Hg) 45 minutes after administration of MPH. A small but significant decrease in HR (3.3 beats per minute) was observed 45 min after administration of placebo. No significant differences in SBP, DBP and HR were found between response groups.
Conclusions: MPH causes a small but significant change in BP at 45 minutes after administration. No changes in HR were observed with MPH at 45 minutes. Responders to MPH treatment do not differ from non-responders in occurrence of BP and HR changes, at least within 45 minutes after administration and with the MPH dosage used in the study.
Readers of this also read:
- Misdiagnosis of Child Abuse Related to Delay in Diagnosing a Paediatric Brain Tumour
- Beyond Television: Children’s Engagement with Online Food and Beverage Marketing
- Improvements in the Measurement of Physical Activity in Childhood Obesity Research; Lessons from Large Studies of Accelerometers
- Maternal Characteristics Determine Stunting in Children of Less than Five Years of Age Results from a National Probabilistic Survey
- The Pathogenesis of Autism
- 18/Mar/2009
Role of Gut Microbiota in Early Infant Development
- 04/Mar/2009
Surgery for Idiopathic Scoliosis: Currently Applied Techniques
- 04/Mar/2009
IgA Nephropathy: A Twenty Year Retrospective Single Center Experience
- 18/Feb/2009
INSIG2 is Associated with Lower Gain in Weight-for-Length Between Birth and Age 6 Months
- 18/Feb/2009
Association Between Polymorphisms in Genes Related to Common Adult Diseases and Fetal Growth
- 17/Feb/2009
Prevalence of Parasomnia in Autistic Children with Sleep Disorders
- 22/Jan/2009
Pediatric Obesity: It’s Time for Prevention Before Conception Can Maternal Obesity Program Pediatric Obesity?
- 19/Nov/2008
A Case Definition for Children with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
- 11/Nov/2008
Improvements in the Measurement of Physical Activity in Childhood Obesity Research; Lessons from Large Studies of Accelerometers
- 05/Nov/2008
No Relation Between Therapeutic Response to Methylphenidate and its Cardiovascular Side Effects in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
- 03/Nov/2008
Body Dissatisfaction Measured with a Figure Preference Task and Self-Esteem in 8 Year Old Children - a Study within the ABIS-Project
- 06/Oct/2008
Maternal Characteristics Determine Stunting in Children of Less than Five Years of Age Results from a National Probabilistic Survey
- 30/Sep/2008
Perinatal Factors Associated with Infant Maltreatment
- 19/Sep/2008
“R-Rating” for Fast Food: A Novel Weapon in Our Fight against the Expanding Teen Obesity Epidemic
- 27/Aug/2008
Beyond Television: Children’s Engagement with Online Food and Beverage Marketing
- 18/Jul/2008
Validity of Some Anthropometric Indicators in the Prediction of High Systolic Blood Pressure Among Indian Adolescents
- 02/Jul/2008
Lemierre Syndrome: Two Preschool Children with Cerebral Infarcts
- 28/Jun/2008
Misdiagnosis of Child Abuse Related to Delay in Diagnosing a Paediatric Brain Tumour
- 20/May/2008