Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

Multi-Detector Coronary CT Imaging for the Identification of Coronary Artery Stenoses in a “Real-World” Population

Submit a Paper

Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology 2014:Suppl. 4 13-22

Original Research

Published on 05 Jan 2015

DOI: 10.4137/CMC.S18223

Further metadata provided in PDF

Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology


Background: Multi-detector computed tomography (CT) has emerged as a modality for the non-invasive assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD). Prior studies have selected patients for evaluation and have excluded many of the “real-world” patients commonly encountered in daily practice. We compared 64-detector-CT (64-CT) to conventional coronary angiography (CA) to investigate the accuracy of 64-CT in determining significant coronary stenoses in a “real-world” clinical population.

Methods: A total of 1,818 consecutive patients referred for 64-CT were evaluated. CT angiography was performed using the GE LightSpeed VCT (GE® Healthcare). Forty-one patients in whom 64-CT results prompted CA investigation were further evaluated, and results of the two diagnostic modalities were compared.

Results: A total of 164 coronary arteries and 410 coronary segments were evaluated in 41 patients (30 men, 11 women, age 39–85 years) who were identified by 64-CT to have significant coronary stenoses and who thereafter underwent CA. The overall per-vessel sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy at the 50% stenosis level were 86%, 84%, 65%, 95%, and 85%, respectively, and 77%, 93%, 61%, 97%, and 91%, respectively, in the per-segment analysis at the 50% stenosis level.

Conclusion: 64-CT is an accurate imaging tool that allows a non-invasive assessment of significant CAD with a high diagnostic accuracy in a “real-world” population of patients. The sensitivity and specificity that we noted are not as high as those in prior reports, but we evaluated a population of patients that is typically encountered in clinical practice and therefore see more “real-world” results.




BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)



Video Abstract


What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
My co-authors and I had a very positive experience with the review and publication process in Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology.  The review was on point, and publication was also rapid and allowed us the needed revisions in the proof preparation process.
Professor Roberto Pedrinelli (Universita di Pisa, Pisa, Italy)
More Testimonials

Quick Links

New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube