Close
Help


Atypical Mechanism of Glucose Modulation by Colesevelam in T2DM

Posted Mon, Dec, 09,2013

Published today in Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes is a new review article by Oliseyenum M. Nwose and Michael R. Jones.  Read more about this paper below:

Title

Atypical Mechanism of Glucose Modulation by Colesevelam in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

Colesevelam’s glucose-lowering mechanism of action is not completely understood. Clinical trials of colesevelam suggest that its mechanism, and often adverse effects, differ from those of other oral antidiabetes drugs. Colesevelam does not affect insulin sensitivity (unlike thiazolidinediones), insulin secretion (unlike sulfonylureas and meglitinides), or early insulin response or glucagon (unlike dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors). Colesevelam may have some effect on glucose absorption, but likely via a different mechanism than α-glucosidase inhibitors. Colesevelam and metformin have similarities regarding hepatic glucose production, but divergent effects on gluconeogenesis versus glycogenolysis, suggesting differing mechanisms of drug action for improving glycemic control. Colesevelam is thought to be a portal glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretagogue with primarily hepatic effects. Bile acid binding by colesevelam leads to TGR5 activation, increased secretion of GLP-1 or other incretins, and inhibition of hepatic glycogenolysis. Colesevelam’s mechanism of action appears to be atypical of other antidiabetes medications, making it a potentially suitable component of many combination regimens in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Click here to learn more about the article, download it and comment

share on

Posted in: Articles Published

  • Efficient Processing: 4 Weeks Average to First Editorial Decision
  • Fair & Independent Expert Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Database Coverage
Services for Authors
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
This is the first time I have published in Genetics and Epigenetics and it was easy and efficient. The peer reviews took less time than I supposed they would.  The remarks were appropriate and made by qualified peer reviewers. All paths from submission to publication were easy, rapid and understandable. I was impressed by the professionalism and punctuality of peer reviewers, Editor in Chief and all staff members of this journal.  Keep up the good ...
Professor Danuta Zastavna (Institute of Hereditary Pathology, Lviv, Ukraine)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube