Close
Help




JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes

Atypical Mechanism of Glucose Modulation by Colesevelam in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Submit a Paper


Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes 2013:6 75-79

Review

Published on 08 Dec 2013

DOI: 10.4137/CMED.S12590


Further metadata provided in PDF



Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes

Abstract

Colesevelam’s glucose-lowering mechanism of action is not completely understood. Clinical trials of colesevelam suggest that its mechanism, and often adverse effects, differ from those of other oral antidiabetes drugs. Colesevelam does not affect insulin sensitivity (unlike thiazolidinediones), insulin secretion (unlike sulfonylureas and meglitinides), or early insulin response or glucagon (unlike dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors). Colesevelam may have some effect on glucose absorption, but likely via a different mechanism than α-glucosidase inhibitors. Colesevelam and metformin have similarities regarding hepatic glucose production, but divergent effects on gluconeogenesis versus glycogenolysis, suggesting differing mechanisms of drug action for improving glycemic control. Colesevelam is thought to be a portal glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretagogue with primarily hepatic effects. Bile acid binding by colesevelam leads to TGR5 activation, increased secretion of GLP-1 or other incretins, and inhibition of hepatic glycogenolysis. Colesevelam’s mechanism of action appears to be atypical of other antidiabetes medications, making it a potentially suitable component of many combination regimens in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.



Downloads

PDF  (706.99 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing


What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes
My experience in publishing my paper in this journal was great. The process was non-complicated and friendly. The editorial team was cooperative and responded promptly and efficiently to my queries. The peer reviewers were professional and fair. Their comments and recommendations added value to my paper. I consider publishing my future research in this journal and recommend it to my colleagues.
Dr Olfat Fawzy (Al Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube