Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Reviews in Cardiology

1,939 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Submit a Paper




Clinical Medicine Reviews in Cardiology Analytics

world_map
Total Journal Article Views Views Downloads Totals
1,939
PubMed 0 0 0
Libertas   1,939 1,939
Totals 0 1,939 1,939
 
Most Read Article:
Central Pressor Response by Olmesartan in the Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla of Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats
Totals 4,978 951 5,929
From July 9, 2009 to April 27, 2015
About Journal Metrics

This service is in beta and may be incomplete or contain minor discrepancies.  We welcome feedback from users.  To tell us what you think visit the survey form.

Journal metrics are simple aggregations of metrics for articles published in this journal.  Metrics are calculated from a variety of sources.  These sources and their known limitations are summarised here.

Total journal views and downloads by month are derived from internal data and usually also Pubmed Central data.  Internal data is recorded in accordance with Project COUNTER Release 3, which is used by many publishers to ensure that visibility data is credible and reliable for readers.  It excludes automated search engine and archiving visits or downloads and rapid sequences of views or downloads to prevent accidental or intentional manipulation of data.  

Prior to September 2008 COUNTER data was not collected and prior to January 2011 views and downloads were not recorded separately.  Views by region are also derived from COUNTER data and because data on geographical region is not always available discrepancies may exist between quantities shown on the map and the table.

Pubmed Central data is only shown where the journal is present on PMC and articles' PMC identifying numbers are recorded in our database.  Owing to PMC limitations data is updated once monthly and is not available prior to September 2010.  



Our Service Promise

  • Prompt Processing: 3-4 Weeks
    to First Editorial Decision
  • Fair & Independent Expert Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Database Coverage
What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Reviews in Cardiology
This is the most author-friendly process I have experienced. The staff were very attentive to us and kept us posted at every step of the process. They were great to work with. I commend the editorial staff for their professionalism and dedication to science and scientific publishing.
Dr Zhu Jie (Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, P. R. China)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube