Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research

High Skp2/Low p57Kip2 Expression is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Human Breast Carcinoma

Submit a Paper

Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research 2015:Suppl. 1 13-21

Original Research

Published on 04 Aug 2015

DOI: 10.4137/BCBCR.S30101

Further metadata provided in PDF

Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research


Downregulation of p57Kip2 is involved in tumor progression, and S-phase kinase-associated protein 2 (Skp2) is an E3 ligase that regulates a variety of cell cycle proteins. However, the prognostic value of p57Kip2 and its correlation with Skp2 in breast cancer have not been fully elucidated. Here we report our study on the expression of p57Kip2 and Skp2 in 102 breast cancer patients by immunohistochemistry, and analysis of clinicopathologic parameters in relation to patient prognosis. The expression of p57Kip2 was negatively associated with Skp2 expression in breast cancer (r = 0.26, P = 0.009). Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that both high Skp2 and low p57Kip2 correlated with poor disease-free survival (DFS) (P < 0.05), and a group with the combination of high Skp2/low p57Kip2 demonstrated even worse DFS (log-rank = 21.118, P < 0.001). In addition, univariate analysis showed that Skp2, p57Kip2, histological grade, lymph node metastasis, and estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER and PR) were all associated with DFS, and multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis and Skp2 were independent prognostic biomarkers. The correlation between p57 and Skp2 was further demonstrated in multiple breast cancer cell lines and cell cycle phases. Half-life and immunoprecipitation (IP) experiments indicated that Skp2 directly interacts with p57Kip2 and promotes its degradation, rather than its mutant p57Kip2 (T310A). Overall, our findings demonstrate that Skp2 directly degrades p57Kip2, and an inverse correlation between these proteins (high skp2/low p57Kip2) is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer. Thus, our results indicate a combined prognostic value of these markers in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.




Supplementary Files 1  (28.61 KB DOCX FORMAT)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)




What Your Colleagues Say About Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research
The submission process for manuscript publication in Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research is as easy as A,B,C!  Any minor hiccups I encountered were quickly addressed by Libertas' expert staff via prompt emails, and the timelines between initial submission and publication are surely the shortest on record!  I will definitely be submitting future manuscripts to this journal, and look forward to working with their professional and expert team.
Dr Maggie Laidlaw (Nutrasource Diagnostics Inc, Guelph, Ontario, Canada)
More Testimonials

Quick Links

New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube