Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology

2,983 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Gemcitabine in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): The Evidence of its Therapeutic Value in Molecular Age

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 25 Oct 2010

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology 2010:2

doi: 10.4137/CMRO.S5842

Abstract

Lung cancer contributes to 31% of male and 26% of female cancer-related deaths and is the largest cause of cancer-related mortality in both men and women. Evaluation of new treatment strategies is ongoing to identify more effective treatments to overcome this dismal prognosis. Numerous studies and meta-analyses have proved the superiority of cisplatin-based third generation chemotherapy in NSCLC first line treatment but no gold standard exists. Two-drug third-generation chemotherapy provides a suitable alternative for patients with contraindications to platinum. Gemcitabine is a third generation agent successfully tested in non small lung cancer, either alone or in platinum and non platinum combination, and has become a drug of choice due to its advantageous toxicity profile. It has also been successfully combined with premetrexed, a new antitoxic agent, as well as with the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor bevacizumab, for adenocarcinoma histological nonsmall cell subtype. On the other hand, the identification of potential prognostic and predictive molecular markers in the latest years, not only for novel targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors but also for gemcitabine and other agents, may enable customized therapies for specific patient populations, allowing improved efficacy and reduced toxicity and cost. This review aims to provide an update on gemcitabine and its therapeutic value in modern molecular sitting.


Downloads

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology
The process of submitting the paper was smooth with little time required on the author's behalf. Reviews were prompt and the process of addressing reviewer comments was very streamlined. All correspondence with the editorial office was extremely professional with immediate responses. This is one of the few journals asking for feedback on their submission process.
Dr Greg Trottier, MD, PhD, FRCSC (University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube