Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology

2,983 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Colorectal Cancer: Focus on Capecitabine

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 27 Jan 2010

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology

Citation:

Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology 2010:2

doi: 10.4137/CMRO.S1599

Abstract

Capecitabine is an oral pro-drug of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) that has demonstrated an efficacy at least equivalent to standard leucovorin (LV)-modulated 5FU I.V. bolus regimen in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients as well as in the adjuvant setting. Despite a mild increase of some side effects, capecitabine is usually better tolerated than 5FU/LV, and could be preferable in the treatment of elderly patients. Moreover, usually the patients compliance with an oral treatment is better than with a regimen requiring the placement of a central venous catheter and infusional devices. The combination of capecitabine with oxaliplatin (XELOX regimen) was shown to be as effective as the combination of 5FU/LV with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4 regimen) in MCRC. The XELOX regimen represents now a new standard of care for MCRC patients, and it will be probably considered in the next future an “user-friendly” alternative to the FOLFOX4 also in resected patients. The addition of bevacizumab to the XELOX regimen was demonstrated to further prolong the progression-free survival of metastatic patients, and is anticipated to reduce the risk of recurrence in resected colon cancer. Despite a higher acquisition cost than 5FU/LV, capecitabine is also cost-effective, because of the reduced costs for drug administration and management of adverse events.


Downloads

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology
I was requested to contribute a review. The objectives, timelines and process were all extremely reasonable and fit in well with my knowledge base and my work as well as my schedule. The process was quite seamless and no paper was ever exchanged--everything was completed on-line. Thanks for the opportunity to make this contribution.
Dr Michael E. Trigg (North Wales, PA, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube