Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Genomics Insights

Application of Machine Learning to Development of Copy Number Variation-based Prediction of Cancer Risk

Submit a Paper


Genomics Insights 2014:7 1-11

Original Research

Published on 26 Jun 2014

DOI: 10.4137/GEI.S15002


Further metadata provided in PDF



Sign up for Email Alerts and keep in touch with Genomics Insights journal news, updates, events and articles

Abstract

In the present study, recurrent copy number variations (CNVs) from non-tumor blood cell DNAs of Caucasian non-cancer subjects and glioma, mye-loma, and colorectal cancer-patients, and Korean non-cancer subjects and hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer, and colorectal cancer patients, were found to reveal for each of the two ethnic cohorts highly significant differences between cancer patients and controls with respect to the number of CN-losses and size-distribution of CN-gains, suggesting the existence of recurrent constitutional CNV-features useful for prediction of predisposition to cancer. Upon identification by machine learning, such CNV-features could extensively discriminate between cancer-patient and control DNAs. When the CNV-features selected from a learning-group of Caucasian or Korean mixed DNAs consisting of both cancer-patient and control DNAs were employed to make predictions on the cancer predisposition of an unseen test group of mixed DNAs, the average prediction accuracy was 93.6% for the Caucasian cohort and 86.5% for the Korean cohort.



Downloads

PDF  (3.92 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

Supplementary Files 1  (122.48 KB ZIP FORMAT)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing


What Your Colleagues Say About Genomics Insights
Recently we published a paper describing cloning of a new kinase gene, MLK4, in Genomics Insights. I was impressed by the prompt processing and  speed of publication.  The comments from the reviewers allowed me to improve the paper significantly.  The reviews were scientifically deep and objective, which is very valuable because in many journals decisions to publish or not to publish are very unfair and subjective. I highly recommend that other ...
Dr Eugene R. Zabarovsky (Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube