Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology

2,983 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

A Review of Dutasteride as Monotherapy in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 05 May 2010

Type: Review

Journal: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology 2010:2

doi: 10.4137/CMRO.S4595

Abstract

Treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has evolved over that last 10 years consequent to the results of several important clinical trials. Although the primary concern for patients is their symptoms, we as urologists are further concerned about the progression of disease and complications of the disease. Two classes of medications, alpha blockers and 5 alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARI), have shown excellent results for treatment of symptoms and improvement of peak urine flow. Either medication alone has benefit, however, the combination of these medications seems to have more benefit than either alone as best demonstrated by 2 major clinical trials. Though combination therapy is overall superior, evidence has shown that dutasteride as monotherapy has continually improving effects on BPH symtoms and progression of disease beyond 2 years of treatment. Given the cost and side effects of a dual treatment regimen coupled with evidence for continued symptom relief when alpha blockers are removed from combination with dutasteride, there is good evidence for use of dutasteride as long-term monotherapy. Although the evidence thus far favours dutasteride over finasteride in symptom relief and peak urine flow in BPH patients, the difference in selection criteria between finasteride and dutasteride trials creates difficulty in deciding superiority of one over the other. The evidence for dutasteride as monotherapy for BPH is reviewed herein with some comparisons to finasteride.


Downloads

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Reviews in Oncology
The process of submitting the paper was smooth with little time required on the author's behalf. Reviews were prompt and the process of addressing reviewer comments was very streamlined. All correspondence with the editorial office was extremely professional with immediate responses. This is one of the few journals asking for feedback on their submission process.
Dr Greg Trottier, MD, PhD, FRCSC (University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube