Environmental Health Insights
Synopsis: An open access, peer reviewed electronic journal that covers impacts of environmental factors on individuals and societies.
Indexing: 3 major databases. Pubmed indexing for NIH-funded research.
Processing time: Decision in 2 weeks for 90% of papers.
Visibility: Most popular article read 1200+ times.
About this journal
Aims and scope:
Environmental Health Insights is a peer-reviewed, open-access online journal which looks at how environmental factors affect the health of individuals and societies.
Editorial standards and procedures:
Submissions, excluding editorials, letters to the editor and dedications, will be peer reviewed by two reviewers. Reviewers are required to provide fair, balanced and constructive reports.
Under our Fairness in Peer Review Policy authors may appeal against reviewers' recommendations which are ill-founded, unobjective or unfair. Appeals are considered by the Editor in Chief or Associate Editor.
Papers are not sent to peer reviewers following submission of a revised manuscript. Editorial decisions on re-submitted papers are based on the author's response to the initial peer review report.
Environmental Health Insights is indexed by:
- CAS
- DOAJ
- Google Scholar
SPARC Europe Seal award winner:
This journal has been awarded a SPARC Europe Seal. The Seal is an initiative of SPARC Europe (Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition) and the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) which is awarded to journals applying a Creative Commons CC-BY copyright license and that make journal metadata accessible to DOAJ.
Amongst other important services DOAJ makes metadata OAI-compliant. This in turn enhances the visibility of papers and allows OAI-harvesters to include the details of journal articles in their services. We encourage readers to make use of this valuable resource. The DOAJ search page is available here.
National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy compliant:
As of April 7 2008, the US NIH Public Access Policy requires that all peer reviewed articles resulting from research carried out with NIH funding be deposited in the Pubmed Central archive.
If you are an NIH employee or grantee Libertas Academica will ensure that you comply with the policy by depositing your paper at Pubmed Central on your behalf.
Call for papers:
Read the Editor in Chief's latest call for papers here.
Submission types accepted:
Submissions of the following types of manuscripts are accepted:
- Original research articles.
- Reviews: comprehensive, authoritative, descriptions of any subject within the journal's scope. They may cover basic science and clinical reviews, ethics, pro/con debates, and equipment reviews.
- Commentaries: focused and opinionated articles on any subject within the journal's scope. These articles are usually related to a contemporary issue.
- Hypotheses: articles that present an original hypothesis backed solely by previously published results rather than any new evidence. They should outline significant progress in thinking that would also be testable.
- Letters to the Editor: these can be either a re-analysis of a previously published article, or a response to such a re-analysis from the authors of the original publication.
- Methodology articles: these discuss a new experimental method, test or procedure. The article must describe a demonstrable advance on what is currently available. The method needs to have been well tested and ideally, but not necessarily, used in a way that proves its value.
- Short reports: brief reports of data from original research.
- Meeting reports: a report pertaining to activity at a meeting or conference Articles published in this journal are immediately available without delay upon publication and enjoy substantial visibility.
- Case reports: reports of clinical cases that can be educational, describe a diagnostic or therapeutic dilemma, suggest an association, or present an important adverse reaction. Case reports must meet appropriate ethical standards.
All submissions are subject to prompt, objective and fair peer review in compliance with our Fairness in Peer Review Policy. Copyright in published articles remains with the author(s). Authors are continually informed of the progress of their paper and our staff are friendly and responsive.
One author recently wrote: "I would like to say that this is the most author-friendly editing process I have experienced in over 150 publications. Thank you most sincerely."
Criteria for publication:
Publication is dependent on peer reviewers' judgement of papers. Reviewers are asked to provide thoughtful and unbiased feedback to authors to ensure that the conclusions of papers are valid and manuscripts achieve reasonable standards of scholarliness and intelligibility.
Previous work in the field must be acknowledged and papers should read without unreasonable difficulty. Papers should fit comfortably within the scope of the journal.
Reviewers are asked to act in a fair, objective and constructive manner which maintains quality standards and helps authors to communicate their research. They are instructed that in areas of genuinely novel research issues may be raised which cannot immediately be resolved and that absolutely rigorous validation of data may therefore not be possible.
More information on the role of peer reviewers is available on the information for reviewers page. Where authors consider that reviewers have made recommendations which are unreasonable, unobjective or ill-founded they may appeal them to the Editor in Chief or Associate Editor under our Fairness in Peer Review Policy.
Articles submitted to other journals:
We are willing to consider papers which have been peer reviewed by other journals but not accepted for publication.
Services for authors:
Prior to peer review of your paper we can:
- Have your paper's reference style revised to meet our requirements,
- Have your paper's English revised by specialist English-speaking technical editors.
After peer review of your paper we can:
- Have your paper revised in accordance with peer reviewer's recommendations and have a summary of responses to the reviewers created by our specialist external substantive editors,
- Provide bound reprints of your article in colour or black and white ,
- Provide online-early rapid publication if your paper prior to typesetting.
What other authors have said:
Libertas Academica actively requests, receives and acts upon feedback from authors, readers and editorial boards. Here's what some recent authors have said about us:
"Within a couple of days the reviewers had been procured and the manuscript was out."
"The communication between your staff and me has been terrific. Whenever progress is made with the manuscript, I receive notice. Quite honestly, I've never had such complete communication with a journal."
"LA is different, and hopefully represents a kind of scientific publication machinery that removes the hurdles from free flow of scientific thought."
Article processing fees:
All submissions to this journal are subject to an article processing fee if they are accepted for publication. Article processing fees are used to fund the processing of your paper and development of the journal. Article processing fees are the only compulsory charge you will face and do not vary according to word count, page count, colour figures or any other factor. There is no additional charge for the author(s) to make any use of their article and no charge to readers to access it.
Full fee waivers are available for authors working in undeveloped nations and partial discounts of 20-50% are available to authors in other nations. Authors must be able to verifiably demonstrate their suitability for a discount or waiver. Availability of waivers and discounts is subject to monthly availability and is given at the publisher's discretion. Waivers and discounts must be applied for prior to submission. Neither are available after submission.
Register as a peer reviewer:
Do you wish to register as a peer reviewer? Or are you already a registered peer reviewer but you need to update your contact details? To register or update your details visit the peer reviewer registration form.
Applicants must be able to demonstrate at least five years of continuous experience in the journal's subject area including at least two in the previous 24 months.
The Editor in Chief has issued a new call for papers. Read it here.
Journal newsletter sent to subscribers in week 26, 2009. Register to receive future newsletters.
Journal newsletter sent to subscribers in week 20, 2009. Register to receive future newsletters.
This journal is now indexed by Google Scholar.
Journal newsletter sent to subscribers in week 15, 2009. Register to receive future newsletters.
Journal newsletter sent to subscribers in week 9, 2009. Register to receive future newsletters.
New call for papers sent to newsletter subscribers in week 8 2009. Readers who wish to be elligible to receive CFPs should subscribe to the newsletter.
Journal newsletter sent to subscribers in week 7, 2009. Register to receive future newsletters.
Peer reviewers are sought. Click here to apply or to update your details.
Women, Environments and Chronic Disease: Shifting the Gaze from Individual Level to Structural Factors
Natalie Hemsing1 and Lorraine Greaves2
1Tobacco Research Coordinator, British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 2Executive Director, British Columbia Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic heart and respiratory diseases are two of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality affecting women. Patterns of and disparities in chronic diseases between sub-populations of women suggest that there are social as well as individual level factors which enhance or impede the prevention or development of chronic respiratory and cardio- vascular diseases. By examining the sex, gender and diversity based dimensions of women’s lung and heart health and how these overlap with environmental factors we extend analysis of preventive health beyond the individual level. We demon- strate how biological, environmental and social factors interact and operate in women’s lives, structuring their opportunities for health and abilities to prevent or manage chronic cardiovascular and respiratory diseases.
Methods: This commentary is based on the findings from two evidence reviews, one conducted on women’s heart health, and another on women’s lung health. Additional literature was also reviewed which assessed the relationship between environmental factors and chronic heart and lung diseases. This paper explores how obesogenic environments, exposure to tobacco smoke, and the experience of living in deprived areas can affect women’s heart and respiratory health. We discuss the barriers which impede women’s ability to engage in physical activity, consume healthy foods, or avoid smoking, tobacco smoke, and other airborne contaminants.
Results: Sex, gender and diversity clearly interact with environmental factors and shape women’s promotion of health and prevention of chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. The environments women live in structure their opportunities for health, and women navigate these environments in unique ways based on gender, socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity and other social factors.
Discussion: Future research, policy and programs relating to the prevention of chronic disease need to move beyond linear individually-oriented models and address these complexities by developing frameworks and interventions which improve environmental conditions for all groups of women. Indeed, in order to improve women’s health, broad social and economic policies and initiatives are required to eliminate negative environmental impacts on women’s opportunities for health.
Readers of this also read:
- Women, Environments and Chronic Disease: Shifting the Gaze from Individual Level to Structural Factors
- Economic Evaluation of Environmental Health Interventions to Support Decision Making
- Insights into the Evolution of Environmental Health
- The Watershed as A Conceptual Framework for the Study of Environmental and Human Health
- Parks, Recreation, and Public Health Collaborative
- 23/Jun/2009
Monetary Diet cost is Associated with not only Favorable but also Unfavorable Aspects of Diet in pregnant Japanese Women: The Osaka Maternal and child Health study
- 12/May/2009
Phytoremediation of Benzophenone and Bisphenol A by Glycosylation with Immobilized Plant Cells
- 06/Apr/2009
Memory Functions in Recreational Pistol Sport Shooters: Does Lead Matter?
- 03/Apr/2009
Insights into the Evolution of Environmental Health
- 13/Mar/2009
The Watershed as A Conceptual Framework for the Study of Environmental and Human Health
- 18/Feb/2009
Economic Evaluation of Environmental Health Interventions to Support Decision Making
- 19/Dec/2008
Women, Environments and Chronic Disease: Shifting the Gaze from Individual Level to Structural Factors
- 23/Jan/2009
Parks, Recreation, and Public Health Collaborative
- 03/Dec/2008
Where is the Theoretical Basis for Understanding and Measuring the Environment for Physical Activity?
- 02/Dec/2008
Health, Climate Change and Energy Vulnerability: A Retrospective Assessment of Strategic Health Authority Policy and Practice in England
- 17/Nov/2008
Environmental Health: Threats and their Interactions
- 11/Nov/2008
Environmental Exposures and Child Health: What we Might Learn in the 21st Century from the National Children’s Study?
- 06/Nov/2008
Biomonitoring of Human Exposure to Prestige Oil: Effects on DNA and Endocrine Parameters
- 31/Oct/2008
The Gravitation of the Moon Plays Pivotal Roles in the Occurrence of the Acute Myocardial Infarction
- 31/Oct/2008
Environments for Active Lifestyles: Sustainable Environments May Enhance Human Health
- 30/Oct/2008
Geographic Determinants of Healthy Lifestyle Change in a Community-Based Exercise Prescription Delivered in Family Practice
- 01/Oct/2008
Environmental and Occupational Exposures in Immigrant Health
- 23/Sep/2008
Environmental Sanitation Crisis: More than just a health issue
- 16/Sep/2008
Comparability of Weighed Dietary Records and a Self-Administered Diet History Questionnaire for Estimating Monetary Cost of Dietary Energy
- 15/Sep/2008
The Cow in the Room: Public Knowledge of the Links Between Dietary Choices and Health and Environmental Impacts
- 15/Sep/2008
Eco-psychiatry and Environmental Conservation: Study from Sundarban Delta, India
- 12/Sep/2008
Autism Spectrum Disorders and Identified Toxic Land Fills: Co-Occurrence Across States
- 20/Aug/2008
Just How Big is the Schism Between the Health Sector and the Water and Sanitation Sector in Developing Countries?
- 19/Aug/2008
Mortality in the Bedouin Population and Proximity to a Regional Industrial Complex
- 11/Aug/2008
Violence and Asthma: A Review
- 25/Jul/2008
Special Issue Editorial (Environmental Health Insights)
- 21/Jul/2008
A QSAR/QSTR Study on the Environmental Health Impact by the Rocket Fuel 1,1-Dimethyl Hydrazine and its Transformation Products
- 18/Jul/2008
Indicators to Measure Success of Smoke-free Policies
- 18/Jul/2008
Environmental Health Research Involving Human Subjects: Ethical Issues
- 14/Jul/2008
Public Health Consequences on Vulnerable Populations from Acute Chemical Releases
- 09/Jul/2008
Entitlement to Sickness Benefits in Sweden: The Social Insurance Officers Experiences
- 20/Jun/2008
Internal Migration and Mortality: The Case of Finland
- 13/Jun/2008
Introductory Editorial (Environmental Health Insights)
- 04/Mar/2008