Close
Help




JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology

Surgical Management of Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Uncinate Process in a Cancer Hospital in Egypt

Submit a Paper


Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology 2015:8 1-6

Original Research

Published on 14 Jan 2015

DOI: 10.4137/CGast.S20650


Further metadata provided in PDF



Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic carcinoma affecting the uncinate process is a challenging surgical condition. Several considerations affect the management plan, including the need for vascular resection and the ability to achieve a clear margin.

Methods: The data of 19 patients who had curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the uncinate process were reviewed. Operative mortality and morbidity, and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated.

Results: The study population included 13 male and 6 female patients with a mean age of 55 years. Nine patients (47.4%) had stage I disease, seven patients (36.8%) had stage II disease, and three patients (15.8%) had stage III disease. A total of 12 patients had Whipple procedure and 7 patients had total pancreatectomy. In total, there were 9 R0 and 10 R1 resections. Operative mortality rate was 10.5% (2/19), postoperative leakage rate was 21.1% (4/19), and wound sepsis rate was 21.1%. Median DFS was 19.2 months. Survival was superior in the Whipple procedure group than in the total pancreatectomy group (median survival 19 months vs 4 months, respectively). Vascular resection and retroperitoneal safety margin status did not affect disease relapse.

Conclusion: Non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the uncinate process should be offered R0 or R1 resection whenever technically feasible.



Downloads

PDF  (1.94 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing


What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology
I had a really positive experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology.  The submission process is easy and friendly.  The review process is very accurate with a considerable quantity of reviewers who give helpful and reasonable suggestions.  The staff are professional and gives prompt email responses.  I recommend colleagues to consider publishing with Libertas Academica.
Dr Vincenzo Neri (University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube