Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology 2012:5 77-83
Review
Published on 18 Oct 2012
DOI: 10.4137/CGast.S8673
Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology
Medical management of ulcerative colitis has continued to evolve over more than half of a century. Perhaps, the important advance was the development of sulfasalazine, a drug initially used for the treatment of inflammatory joint disease and only later in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. Sulfasalazine was a combination designer drug consisting of sulfapyridine, a sulfa-containing antibacterial agent, and 5-amino-salicylate (5-ASA), an anti-inflammatory agent. Its value appeared to be its ability to target a therapeutic concentration of the 5-ASA component of the medication primarily in the colon, largely avoiding proximal small intestinal absorption. With increasing experience, however, it also became evident that many patients treated with sulfasalazine developed intolerance to the drug and, in some rare instances, serious drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions, largely to the sulfapyridine portion. As a result, a number of alternative forms of delivery of 5-ASA were developed consisting of either a similar sulfasalazine-like prodrug formulation requiring luminal destruction of an azo-bond releasing the 5-ASA or a pH-dependent 5-ASA packaging system that permitted release in the distal intestine, particularly in the colon. As a result, 5-ASA—containing medications continue to provide a valuable management tool for remission induction in mildly to moderately active distal or extensive ulcerative colitis, an additional option for more severely symptomatic disease and value for maintenance therapy with limited potential side effects, even with long-term use.
PDF (439.22 KB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
PMC HTML
I had a really positive experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology. The submission process is easy and friendly. The review process is very accurate with a considerable quantity of reviewers who give helpful and reasonable suggestions. The staff are professional and gives prompt email responses. I recommend colleagues to consider publishing with Libertas Academica.
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube