Close
Help




JOURNAL

Environmental Health Insights

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Graded Skeletal Muscle Injury in Live Rats

Submit a Paper


Environmental Health Insights 2014:Suppl. 1 31-39

Review

Published on 20 Nov 2014

DOI: 10.4137/EHI.S15255


Further metadata provided in PDF



Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Environmental Health Insights

Abstract

Introduction: Increasing number of stretch–shortening contractions (SSCs) results in increased muscle injury.

Methods: Fischer Hybrid rats were acutely exposed to an increasing number of SSCs in vivo using a custom-designed dynamometer. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging was conducted 72 hours after exposure when rats were infused with Prohance and imaged using a 7T rodent MRI system (GE Epic 12.0). Images were acquired in the transverse plane with typically 60 total slices acquired covering the entire length of the hind legs. Rats were euthanized after MRI, the lower limbs removed, and tibialis anterior muscles were prepared for histology and quantified stereology.

Results: Stereological analyses showed myofiber degeneration, and cellular infiltrates significantly increased following 70 and 150 SSC exposure compared to controls. MRI images revealed that the percent affected area significantly increased with exposure in all SSC groups in a graded fashion. Signal intensity also significantly increased with increasing SSC repetitions.

Discussion: These results suggest that contrast-enhanced MRI has the sensitivity to differentiate specific degrees of skeletal muscle strain injury, and imaging data are specifically representative of cellular histopathology quantified via stereological analyses.



Downloads

PDF  (3.09 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing


What Your Colleagues Say About Environmental Health Insights
My experience in publishing our manuscript in Environmental Health Insights was positive.  The speed of processing was the fastest of all the journals I have encountered.  The peer review and editorial comments were to-the-point and professional.  The open reader access greatly enhances article visibility.  I would publish again in this journal if I have suitable studies to publish.
Dr Sue Ming (New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube