Close
Help




JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics

Lopinavir/Ritonavir: A Review for 2011

Submit a Paper


Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics 2011:3 93-102

Review

Published on 17 Feb 2011

DOI: 10.4137/CMT.S2018


Further metadata provided in PDF



Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics

Abstract

Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) is a boosted protease inhibitor (PI) combination used as an alternative agent in the management of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). HIV treatment consists of combinations of classes of medications with complementing mechanisms of action. Protease inhibitor-based therapy is one of the mainstays of therapy. Ritonavir-boosted lopinavir can be dosed once- or twice-daily based on previous antiretroviral therapy, patient characteristics, and concomitant medications. It is currently available as an oral solution or tablet formulation and can be given without regard to food if given as a tablet. Lopinavir is extensively metabolized via the cytochrome (CYP) P450 3A4 and 3A5 hepatic isoenzymes and ritonavir is a potent inhibitor of CYP34A. Co-administration of low-dose ritonavir leads to increased plasma concentrations of lopinavir. There is potential for numerous drug-drug interactions when additional medications are administered. Clinical trials have been reported previously demonstrating the safety and efficacy of LPV/r in children, adolescents and adults and it is readily used throughout these populations. Current clinical trials are focused on examining the efficacy and toxicity of boosted-PI monotherapy as a treatment option in previously suppressed adults.



Downloads

PDF  (546.12 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing


What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics
testimonial_image
I was delighted to submit an invited review on cluster headache pharmacology.  As someone who writes a few papers per year on these subjects, I appreciated that the submission, review and approval process for the paper was smooth and efficient. Our reviewers raised important points that improved the overall quality of the manuscript. Overall a very positive experience.
Dr Michael J. Marmura (Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube