Close
Help


What Do Our Authors and Peer Reviewers Say About Peer Review Quality?

Posted Tue, Sep, 28,2010

Libertas operates an industry-standard blind peer review process.  To balance speed with editorial quality we have developed a purpose-built peer review system. 

Every author and peer reviewer is asked for feedback on their experience with us.  Here are some examples of what they say about our peer review process.

What Authors Say:

"rapid and fair"

"timely and transparent"

"the quality of the reviews as good as any I have experienced"

"reviews are of high quality and fast, editors make decisions on the basis of scientific argument"

"smooth and speedy"

"the quality of the reviews were as good as any I have experienced in 30 years of publishing in scientific journals"

"easy and smooth"

"they professionally handled the review process... the quality of the reviews was high."

"reviews were prompt and the process of addressing reviewer comments was very streamlined"

"fast and fair"

"the most author-friendly editing process I have expereinced in over 50 publications."

"the easiest and most user-friendly interface we have encountered"

"the most author-friendly process I have experienced"

"speedy and fair"

"reviews are fast, pertinent, and instructive"

"the prompt reviews and other processes involved is a credit to the competence and experience of staff of Libertas Academica"


What Peer Reviewers Say:

"efficient and easy to navigate."

"very well organized and simple to use"

"fast and efficient"

"The review process is extremely streamlined and seems effortless; at the same time yielding high quality material. Great balance."

"The diligence of the editorial staff ensures the review process is fair, fast and very well-organized.  I highly recommend potential authors and reviewers to submit to and review for this journal."

"the review process in all the Libertas Academica journals I have had the privilege of reviewing papers for is second to none"

"fast and friendly... they have my highest recommendation"

"efficient, well organized, and user friendly"

"LA is a great publisher to work with.  The online review system is easy to navigate and the review process is straightforward."

"one of my most pleasant and friendly experiences as a peer reviewer... a breath of fresh air in peer reviewing"


Visit the Testimonials page to read more

share on
  • Efficient Processing: 4 Weeks Average to First Editorial Decision
  • Fair & Independent Expert Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Database Coverage
Services for Authors
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
This is the first time I have published in Genetics and Epigenetics and it was easy and efficient. The peer reviews took less time than I supposed they would.  The remarks were appropriate and made by qualified peer reviewers. All paths from submission to publication were easy, rapid and understandable. I was impressed by the professionalism and punctuality of peer reviewers, Editor in Chief and all staff members of this journal.  Keep up the good ...
Professor Danuta Zastavna (Institute of Hereditary Pathology, Lviv, Ukraine)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube