Close
Help


L. Pneumophila in Cooling Tower Water

Posted Wed, Jan, 15,2014

Published today in Air, Soil and Water Research is a new original research article by Pipat Luksamijarulkul, Sumawadee Kornkrerkkiat, Chayaporn Saranpuetti and Dusit Sujirarat.  Read more about this paper below:

Title

Predictive Factors of Legionella pneumophila Contamination in Cooling Tower Water

Abstract

A cross-sectional study of 160 water samples collected from 72 cooling towers in 4 hospitals, 7 department stores, and 3 hotels in Bangkok was carried out to investigate Legionella pneumophila contamination and its predictive factors. All water samples were cultured for Legionella spp. and tested for L. pneumophila by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Some cooling tower parameters were measured and recorded. Data were analyzed using χ2-test, odds ratio and stepwise logistic regression analysis at the significant level of a = 0.05. Results revealed that the Legionella spp. contamination was 20.0% (32/160) and for L. pneumophila was 61.3% (98/160). The sensitivity of real-time PCR was higher than that of the culture. Factors significantly associated with L. pneumophila contamination by χ2-test were: the cooling tower model, size, use duration, pH, water temperature, use of ozone, and residual free chlorine (95% CI of OR > 1.0, P < 0.05). After stepwise logistic regression analysis, four predictive factors remained. These included the cooling tower model being a cross-flow type (adjusted OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.2–7.8, P = 0.017), use duration >5 years (adjusted OR = 3.6, 95% CI = 1.3–10.1, P = 0.016), water temperature <29.4°C (adjusted OR = 7.9, 95% CI = 2.1–29.6, P = 0.002), and residual free chlorine <0.2 ppm (adjusted OR = 8.5, 95% CI = 2.1–34.9, P = 0.003). Additionally, the risk probability for L. pneumophila contamination was estimated to be 13.9–97.1%, depending on the ­combination of predictive factors.

Click here to learn more about the article, download it and comment

share on

Posted in: Articles Published

  • Efficient Processing: 4 Weeks Average to First Editorial Decision
  • Fair & Independent Expert Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Database Coverage
Services for Authors
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
Thank you very much for inviting and providing me the opportunity to become one of the reviewers of Libertas Academica journals. It not only makes me learn more about the medical science in the topic of my interest, but also feel honor for contributing with your journals.  In addition, the reviewing processes were very smooth and I received answers of any questions promptly even after working hours. The staff is very professional and friendly. I ...
Dr Ekamol Tantisattamo (Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube