Close
Help


Ventricular Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Parkinson’s Disease.

Posted Wed, Mar, 13,2013

Published today in Biomarker Insights is a new original research article by Chera L. Maarouf, Thomas G. Beach, Charles H. Adler, Michael Malek-Ahmadi, Tyler A. Kokjohn, Brittany N. Dugger, Douglas G. Walker, Holly A. Shill, Sandra A. Jacobson, Marwan N. Sabbagh, Alex E. Roher and Arizona Parkinson’s Disease Consortium.  Read more about this paper below:

Title

Quantitative Appraisal of Ventricular Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Neuropathologically Diagnosed Parkinson's Disease Cases Lacking Alzheimer's Disease Pathology

Abstract

Identifying biomarkers that distinguish Parkinson’s disease (PD) from normal control (NC) individuals has the potential to increase diagnostic sensitivity for the detection of early-stage PD. A previous proteomic study identified potential biomarkers in postmortem ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (V-CSF) from neuropathologically diagnosed PD subjects lacking Alzheimer’s disease (AD) neuropathology. In the present study, we assessed these biomarkers as well as p-tau181, Aβ42, and S100B by ELISA in PD (n = 43) and NC (n = 49) cases. The p-tau181/Aß42 ratio and ApoA-1 showed statistically significant differences between groups. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that p-tau181/Aβ42 had a significant odds ratio: OR = 1.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–1.84), P = 0.006. Among the molecules investigated, intriguing correlations were observed that require further investigation. Our results suggest co-existent AD CSF biomarkers within the PD group notwithstanding that it was selected to minimize AD neuropathological lesions.

Click here to learn more about the article, download it and comment

share on

Posted in: Articles Published

  • Efficient Processing: 4 Weeks Average to First Editorial Decision
  • Fair & Independent Expert Peer Review
  • High Visibility & Extensive Database Coverage
Services for Authors
What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
The process of submitting the paper was smooth with little time required on the author's behalf. Reviews were prompt and the process of addressing reviewer comments was very streamlined. All correspondence with the editorial office was extremely professional with immediate responses. This is one of the few journals asking for feedback on their submission process.
Dr Greg Trottier, MD, PhD, FRCSC (University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube