Help
Posted Wed, Nov, 14,2012
Every paper published in Libertas journals is peer reviewed by two highly qualified peer reviewers. After each peer review is completed we ask the reviewers for their feedback on our peer review process. This helps us to ensure that we're consistently achieving our goal of providing a high quality peer review process.
We asked reviewers to rate their experience in five areas as very good, good, fair, poor or very poor. Here's what they told us:
90% rated their communication with Libertas staff as good or very good
91% rated the accessibility of manuscript files as good or very good
92% rated the interface to upload their peer review report as good or very good
93% rated their over-all experience as a peer reviewer as good or very good
See what your colleagues have said about peer reviewing for Libertas journals by reading their testimonials.
Posted in: TestimonialsProcessing Speed and Quality
News Categories
Thu 08 Oct, 2015
Published This Week (5th - 9th October)Thu 08 Oct, 2015
Biomarker Insights Paper Endorsed by Editor in ChiefWed 07 Oct, 2015
Interview with Professor Jamie DaviesHaving just published in a Libertas Academica journal (Evolutionary Bioinformatics) for the first time, I can attest that I was impressed by the process. Every stage from submission to typesetting and correspondence on matters relating to publishing was simple and efficient. In addition to this, regular updates of the status of the manuscript (with clear explanation of the status) enabled the process to be transparent and informative. I would not hesitate to use Libertas Academica ...
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube