Help
Posted Wed, May, 16,2012
Every paper published in Libertas journals is peer reviewed by two highly qualified peer reviewers. After each peer review is completed we ask the reviewers for their feedback on our peer review process. This helps us to ensure that we're consistently achieving our goal of providing a high quality peer review process.
We asked reviewers to rate their experience in five areas as very good, good, fair, poor or very poor. Here's what they told us:
93% rated instructions on how to undertake a peer review as good or very good
90% rated their communication with Libertas staff as good or very good
91% rated the accessibility of manuscript files as good or very good
92% rated the interface to upload their peer review report as good or very good
93% rated their over-all experience as a peer reviewer as good or very good
See what your colleagues have said about peer reviewing for Libertas journals by reading their testimonials
Posted in: TestimonialsProcessing Speed and Quality
News Categories
Thu 08 Oct, 2015
Published This Week (5th - 9th October)Thu 08 Oct, 2015
Biomarker Insights Paper Endorsed by Editor in ChiefWed 07 Oct, 2015
Interview with Professor Jamie DaviesIt is a great pleasure to serve as a reviewer for Libertas Academica. The publisher has created an efficient review system which can easily find the right reviewer to review the manuscripts. I experienced this merit because all of the manuscripts forwarded to me are closely related to my research interests and I can give my scientific comment quickly and easily. A good review system can benefit both reviewers and authors and help cutting-edge work ...
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube