Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

338,789 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Intracoronary Versus Intravenous Adenosine-Induced Maximal Coronary Hyperemia for Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 12 Feb 2014

Type: Original Research

Journal: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology

Citation: Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology 2014:8 17-21

doi: 10.4137/CMC.S11535

Abstract

Background: Maximal hyperemia is the critical prerequisite for fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment. Despite intravenous (IV) adenosine currently being the recommended approach, intracoronary (IC) administration of adenosine constitutes a valuable alternative in everyday practice. However, it is surprisingly unclear which IC strategy allows the achievement of FFR values that are comparable to IV adenosine.

Objectives: This study sought to compare increasing doses of IC adenosine versus IV adenosine for FFR.

Methods: 30 intermediate coronary stenoses undergoing FFR measurement were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. Hyperemia was sequentially induced by bolus of IC adenosine (ADN; 150 µg) followed by IV adenosine (IVADN) infusion over 3 minutes at dose of (140 µg/kg/min). FFR values, symptoms, and development of atrioventricular block were recorded.

Results: 150 µg doses of IC adenosine were well tolerated and associated with fewer symptoms than IV adenosine. Intracoronary adenosine doses induced a significant decrease of FFR compared with baseline levels (P < 0.01). Among the 6 patients with FFR values less than 0.80 identified by IVADN, 4 were correctly identified also by 150 µg bolus IC adenosine. Larger randomized studies with cross-over design are necessary to verify the results.

Conclusions: This small pilot study suggests that IC adenosine might be an alternative to IV adenosine. Larger randomized studies with a cross-over design are necessary.


Downloads

PDF  (479.48 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
My co-authors and I had a very positive experience with the review and publication process in Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology.  The review was on point, and publication was also rapid and allowed us the needed revisions in the proof preparation process.
Professor Roberto Pedrinelli (Universita di Pisa, Pisa, Italy)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube