Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology 2012:5 43-50
Original Research
Published on 23 Aug 2012
DOI: 10.4137/CGast.S10070
Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology
The development of intestinal metaplasia (IM) has been purported to be a critical step in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. However, the natural history of IM in migrant human populations has not been well elucidated. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of gastric cancer posed by IM in Asian immigrants undergoing gastric cancer screening. A retrospective review of Asian immigrants found to have IM during screening was conducted over an 18-month period. In total, 222 patients were found to have IM. Altogether, 24% had a history of smoking, 48% had a family history of gastric cancer, and 52% had a history of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection with a 96% eradication rate. Patients with stable IM (SIM) were then compared with those who developed high risk pathology (HRP), specifically dysplasia and/or adenocarcinoma. Thirty-five patients (16%) were included in the HRP group, 31 with dysplasia (14%) and 4 with adenocarcinoma (2%). Of those with dysplasia, 55% demonstrated regression to IM over the course of follow-up. Patients in the SIM group were more likely to be female (60% vs. 31%, P = 0.002) and more likely to have had a normal biopsy during follow-up (32% vs. 9%, P = 0.005). Odds ratios for IM stability were 3.3 (95% CI 1.5–7.0) and 5.0 (95% CI 1.5–17.1) for female gender and presence of a normal biopsy, respectively. Intestinal metaplasia in immigrant Asian populations is predominantly a stable histologic finding associated with a low rate of persistent dysplasia and adenocarcinoma.
PDF (1.59 MB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
PMC HTML
I had a really positive experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology. The submission process is easy and friendly. The review process is very accurate with a considerable quantity of reviewers who give helpful and reasonable suggestions. The staff are professional and gives prompt email responses. I recommend colleagues to consider publishing with Libertas Academica.
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube