Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine 2015:Suppl. 1 1-7
Review
Published on 29 Apr 2015
DOI: 10.4137/CCRPM.S23283
Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a chronic, progressive fibrotic lung disease with a dismal prognosis. ILD of unknown etiology is referred to as idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP), which is sporadic in the majority of cases. ILD is frequently accompanied by rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SSc), polymyositis/dermatomyositis (PM/DM), and other autoimmune diseases, and is referred to as collagen vascular disease-associated ILD (CVD-ILD). Susceptibility to ILD is influenced by genetic and environmental factors. Recent advances in radiographic imaging techniques such as high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scanning as well as high-throughput genomic analyses have provided insights into the genetics of ILD. These studies have repeatedly revealed an association between IIP (sporadic and familial) and a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the promoter region of the mucin 5B (MUC5B). HLA-DRB1*11 alleles have been reported to correlate with ILD in European patients with SSc, whereas in Japanese patients with RA, the HLA-DR2 serological group was identified. The aim of this review is to describe the genetic background of sporadic IIP, CVD-ILD, drug-induced-ILD (DI-ILD), pneumoconiosis, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. The genetics of ILD is still in progress. However, this information will enhance the understanding of the pathogenesis of ILD and aid the identification of novel therapeutic targets for personalized medicine in future.
PDF (461.31 KB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
PMC HTML
Working with the editorial staff and reviewers for Clinical Medicine Insights: Therapeutics was a positive experience. The online submission/revision process was easy and staff were readily available to answer any questions. Reviewers were knowledgeable, lending expert comments that allowed for improvement in content information. I highly recommend others practitioners and researchers to consider Libertas Academica journals for their next publication.
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube