Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Air, Soil and Water Research

138,613 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Field Evaluation of Solid Sorbents for Ambient Air Sampling of Pesticides

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 23 Sep 2010

Type: Original Research

Journal: Air, Soil and Water Research

Citation: Air, Soil and Water Research 2010:3 57-66

doi: 10.4137/ASWR.S5924

Abstract

Seven solid sorbents including Amberlite® XAD-2 and XAD-4, Tenax-TA®, Anasorb-747, Chromosorb 102, 108, and 750 were evaluated for the collection of the gas phase fraction of pesticides under field conditions at an agricultural site, Bratt’s Lake, SK, located in the Canadian prairies. The polyurethane foam (PUF)/sorbent cartridge consists of two PUF layers which sandwich the solid sorbent and each layer was analyzed separately to determine which portion of the PUF/solid sorbent retained the pesticides and the extent of breakthrough. The pesticides that had high detection frequency throughout the study and ambient air concentrations well above MDL were triallate, trifluralin, ethalfluralin, and chlorpyrifos. All sorbents had improved collection efficiency as compared to a standard 7.6 cm PUF and the improvement varied with each pesticide. The most effective sorbents for trapping gas phase fraction of pesticides were XAD-2, XAD-4, Tenax-TA, and Chromosorb 108. The only sorbent not recommended for use is Chromosorb 750. For selected sampling periods when ambient concentrations were above detection limits a number of other organochlorine and organophosphorus pesticides also showed more efficient collection with PUF/solid sorbent cartridges as compared to PUF cartridge. Shorter sample collection periods of 4-days improved detection frequency of pesticides.


Downloads

PDF  (551.92 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Air, Soil and Water Research
testimonial_image
As an open access journal with an international audience, Air, Soil and Water Research has a tremendous worldwide impact.  Peer reviewing process is essential to maintain the high standard of quality of published papers, and I have thoroughly enjoyed my participation as a reviewer for Air, Soil and Water Research. The online review system is very easy and simply to use. I am looking forward to peer reviewing additional articles in the future. ...
Dr Dionisis Gasparatos (Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube