Koji Kadota¹, Tomokazu Konishi² and Kentaro Shimizu¹

¹Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan. ²Faculty of Bioresource Sciences, Akita Prefectural University, Shimoshinjyo, Nakano, Akita 010-0195, Japan.

Abstract: Large-scale expression profiling using DNA microarrays enables identification of tissue-selective genes for which expression is considerably higher and/or lower in some tissues than in others. Among numerous possible methods, only two outlier-detection-based methods (an AIC-based method and Sprent’s non-parametric method) can treat equally various types of selective patterns, but they produce substantially different results. We investigated the performance of these two methods for different parameter settings and for a reduced number of samples. We focused on their ability to detect selective expression patterns robustly. We applied them to public microarray data collected from 36 normal human tissue samples and analyzed the effects of both changing the parameter settings and reducing the number of samples. The AIC-based method was more robust in both cases. The findings confirm that the use of the AIC-based method in the recently proposed ROKU method for detecting tissue-selective expression patterns is correct and that Sprent’s method is not suitable for ROKU.