Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology 2014:Suppl. 3 43-48
Review
Published on 13 Apr 2015
DOI: 10.4137/CMC.S17065
Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology
Background: In patients with cardiovascular diseases, inflammatory and hemostatic biomarkers are significant indicators of prognosis. We investigated whether circulating inflammatory and hemostatic biomarkers were predictive markers for all-cause death and cancer death in a population of community-dwelling Japanese.
Methods: We studied 1,920 healthy Japanese adults who underwent health examinations in 1999. Those who reported a history of inflammatory diseases and malignancy on a baseline questionnaire were excluded. Inflammatory and hemostatic biomarkers were measured in the remaining 1,862 participants, who were followed up periodically for 10 years. Multivariate proportional hazards regression analysis was used to estimate all-cause and cancer mortality.
Results: A total of 258 participants died during follow-up: 87 from cancer, 38 from cerebro-cardiovascular diseases, and 133 from other diseases. Mean C-reactive protein (CRP) levels at baseline were significantly higher in decedents than in survivors. Mean von Willebrand factor (vWF) levels at baseline were significantly higher in decedents than in survivors. The Cox proportional hazards model after adjustments for age and sex showed that CRP (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06–1.51) and vWF (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00–1.01) were independent predictors of all-cause death. CRP (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.06–1.86) and vWF (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00–1.02) were also independent predictive markers for cancer death.
Conclusions: Serum CRP and vWF were predictors of all-cause death and cancer death in the population of community dwelling Japanese.
PDF (468.51 KB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
PMC HTML
My co-authors and I had a very positive experience with the review and publication process in Clinical Medicine Insights: Cardiology. The review was on point, and publication was also rapid and allowed us the needed revisions in the proof preparation process.
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube