Close
Help




JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine

Prognostic Value of Resting Pulmonary Function in Heart Failure

Submit a Paper


Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine 2013:7 35-43

Original Research

Published on 05 Sep 2013

DOI: 10.4137/CCRPM.S12525


Further metadata provided in PDF



Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine

Abstract

Background: The heart and lungs are intimately linked anatomically and physiologically, and, as a result, heart failure (HF) patients often develop changes in pulmonary function. This study examined the prognostic value of resting pulmonary function (PF) in HF.

Methods and results: In all, 134 HF patients (enrolled from January 1, 1999 Through December 31, 2005; ejection fraction (EF) = 29% ± 11%; mean age = 55 ± 12 years; 65% male) were followed for 67 ± 34 months with death/transplant confirmed via the Social Security Index and Mayo Clinic registry. PF included forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), and alveolar volume (VA). Patients were divided in tertiles according to PF with survival analysis via log-rank Mantel-Cox test with chi-square analysis. Groups for FVC included (1) .96%, (2) 96% to 81%, and (3) ,81% predicted (chi-square = 18.9, P < 0.001). Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (BC) suggested differences between groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.001) and 2 and 3 (P = 0.008). Groups for FEV1 included (1) .94%, (2) 94% to 77%, and (3) ,77% predicted (chi-square = 17.3, P < 0.001). BC suggested differences between groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.001). Groups for DLCO included (1) .90%, (2) 90% to 75%, and (3) ,75% predicted (chi-square = 11.9, P = 0.003). BC suggested differences between groups 1 and 3 (P < 0.001). Groups for VA included (1) .97%, (2) 97% to 87%, and (3) ,87% predicted (Chi-square = 8.5, P = 0.01). BC suggested differences between groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.014) and 1 and 3 (P = 0.003).

Conclusions: In a well-defined cohort of HF patients, resting measures of PF are predictive of all-cause mortality.



Downloads

PDF  (581.22 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing


What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
Publishing in Gene Regulation and Systems Biology was a very positive experience.  I was impressed by the fast and uncomplicated submission process as well as the clear and professional peer review process which helped to improve the manuscript.  The Libertas Academica team was very patient and helpful.  I would definitely recommend the journal to other colleagues in the field!
Dr Cameron Moshfegh (Federal Institute of Technology, Switzerland)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube