Close
Help
Need Help?





JOURNAL

Genomics Insights

31,932 Journal Article Views | Journal Analytics

Design, Construction and Validation of Targeted BAC Array-Based CGH Test for Detecting the Most Commons Chromosomal Abnormalities

Submit a Paper



Publication Date: 11 Mar 2010

Type: Original Research

Journal: Genomics Insights

Citation: Genomics Insights 2010:3 9-21

doi: 10.4137/GEI.S3683

Abstract

We designed a targeted-array called GOLD (Gain or Loss Detection) Chip consisting of 900 FISH-mapped non-overlapping BAC clones spanning the whole genome to enhance the coverage of 66 unique human genomic regions involved in well known micro-deletion/microduplication syndromes. The array has a 10 Mb backbone to guarantee the detection of the aneuploidies, and has an implemented resolution for telomeres, and for regions involved in common genomic diseases. In order to evaluate clinical diagnostic applicability of GOLDChip, analytical validity was carried-out via retrospective analysis of DNA isolated from a series of cytogenetically normal amniocytes and cytogenetically abnormal DNA obtained from cultured amniocytes, peripheral blood and/or cell lines. We recruited 47 DNA samples corresponding to pathologies with significant frequencies (Cri du Chat syndrome, Williams syndrome, Prader Willi/Angelman syndromes, Smith-Magenis syndrome, DiGeorge syndrome, Miller-Dieker syndrome, chromosomes 13, 18 and 21 trisomies). We set up an experimental protocol that allowed to identify chromosomal rearrangements in all the DNA samples analyzed. Our results provide evidence that our targeted BAC array can be used for the identification of the most common microdeletion syndromes and common aneuploidies.


Downloads

PDF  (8.77 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing




What Your Colleagues Say About Genomics Insights
Recently we published a paper describing cloning of a new kinase gene, MLK4, in Genomics Insights. I was impressed by the prompt processing and  speed of publication.  The comments from the reviewers allowed me to improve the paper significantly.  The reviews were scientifically deep and objective, which is very valuable because in many journals decisions to publish or not to publish are very unfair and subjective. I highly recommend that other ...
Dr Eugene R. Zabarovsky (Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube