Close
Help




JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine

Comparison of Vinorelbine-Cisplatin with Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Submit a Paper


Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine 2008:2 27-34

Published on 18 Apr 2008


Further metadata provided in PDF



Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Circulatory, Respiratory and Pulmonary Medicine

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this trial was to compare cisplatin-plus-vinorelbine regimen with cisplatin-plus-gemcitabine regimen in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and Methods: Chemonaive patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC received either vinoelbine 30 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (day 1) every 21 days (VC arm) or gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (day 1) every 21 days (GC arm).

Results: One hundred thirty four patients (67 VC and 67 GC) were included to the study. Overall response rates for the VC arm (31.2%) were not significantly different from that of the GC arm (34.3%). There were no differences in overall survival and one-year survival rates. Median survival and one-year survival rates for the VC and GC groups were 10.6 and 11.5 months, 45% and 46.8%, respectively. Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia was significantly higher on the GC arm (VC 1.4% v GC 8.9%, p 0.05), as was febrile neutropenia on the VC arm (VC 8.9% v GC 1.2%, p 0.05).

Conclusion: VC and GC demonstrated similar efficacy but there were differences in toxicity profiles.



Downloads

PDF  (255.99 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing


What Your Colleagues Say About Libertas Academica
As a peer reviewer for Environmental Health Insights, I have had the opportunity to read several very important research articles in my field.  Based on my experience, the submission process, review standards, and publication expectations are rigorous and demanding as other high impact journals.  I look forward to further reviewing papers for Environmental Health Insights and learning from my peers and other leaders in the field.
Dr Jianbo Jiang (Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube