Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports 2015:8 1-4
Case report
Published on 12 Jan 2015
DOI: 10.4137/CCRep.S20907
Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Case Reports
The incidence of ectopic pregnancy is approximately 1.3~2% of all pregnancies, and more than 90% of ectopic pregnancies are detected in the ampulla of the fallopian tube. Ectopic pregnancy occurring in tubal stump after tubectomy is extremely rare, and the frequency of tubal stump pregnancy is approximately 0.4% of all pregnancies. We report one of these rare cases of ectopic pregnancy in a 26-year-old Japanese woman, gravida 4, parity 1. She had undergone laparoscopic tubectomy because of a tubal pregnancy two years ago. She was presented to our hospital with a positive pregnancy test, but no gestational sac was detected in the uterus by echography, even though the level of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) in the blood was elevated to 8,900 mIU/mL. Laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy was performed. During surgery, the position of the pregnancy was found to be in the tubal stump, where tubectomy had already been performed, and the gestational sac was successfully removed. After the surgery, the condition of the patient uneventfully improved and she was discharged from the hospital three days after the surgery. The diagnosis of tubal stump pregnancy is more difficult than that of the more common positions of an ectopic pregnancy in the fallopian tube, and so it is more important to carefully examine the patients with suspected ectopic pregnancy. Laparoscopic surgery is one of the options for tubal stump pregnancy if diagnosed early and if the condition of the patient is stable.
PDF (4.92 MB PDF FORMAT)
RIS citation (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)
BibTex citation (BIBDESK, LATEX)
PMC HTML
I had a great experience publishing my case report in this journal. The submission to editorial decision time was very short, and in addition there were frequent updates by email regarding the status of the manuscript. I thought the editors were very friendly and supportive. I would recommend this journal to anyone wishing to publish his/her research in a quality journal with a decent article processing speed. I also appreciate the support given by the ...
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube