Home Journals Subjects About My LA Reviewers Authors News Submit
Username: Password:
.
(close)

(Ctrl-click to select multiple journals)


How should we address you?

Your email address


Enter the three character code
Visual CAPTCHA
Privacy Statement
 
 
 
 
 
 

Modeling Prognostic Factors in Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinomas

Authors: Taxiarchis Botsis, Valsamo K. Anagnostou, Gunnar Hartvigsen, George Hripcsak and Chunhua Weng
Publication Date: 20 Jan 2010
Cancer Informatics 2009:7 281-291

Taxiarchis Botsis1,2, Valsamo K. Anagnostou3, Gunnar Hartvigsen2, George Hripcsak1 and Chunhua Weng1

1Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, 10032 New York, USA. 2Department of Computer Science, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway. 3Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, 06511 New Haven, USA.

Abstract

Background:  The accurate prognosis for patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinomas requires the incorporation of more factors than those included in AJCC TNM system.

Methods:  We identified 218 patients diagnosed with stage I and II pancreatic adenocarcinoma at NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/ Columbia University Medical Center (1999 to 2009). Tumor and clinical characteristics were retrieved and associations with survival were assessed by univariate Cox analysis. A multivariable model was constructed and a prognostic score was calculated; the prognostic strength of our model was assessed with the concordance index.

Results: Our cohort had a median age of 67 years and consisted of 49% men; the median follow-up time was 14.3 months and the 5-year survival 3.6%. Age, tumor differentiation and size, alkaline phosphatase, albumin and CA 19-9 were the independent factors of the final multivariable model; patients were thus classified into low (n = 14, median survival = 53.7 months), intermediate (n = 124, median survival = 19.7 months) and high risk groups (n = 80, median survival = 12.3 months). The prognostic classification of our model remained significant after adjusting for adjuvant chemotherapy and the concordance index was 0.73 compared to 0.59 of the TNM system.

Conclusion:  Our prognostic model was accurate in stratifying patients by risk and could be incorporated into clinical decisions.

Categories: Bioinformatics , Cancer