Magnetic Resonance Insights
Synopsis: An open access, peer reviewed electronic journal that covers development and use of magnetic resonance.
Indexing: Indexed by DOAJ. Pubmed indexing for NIH-funded research.
Processing time: Decision in 2 weeks for 90% of papers.
Visibility: Most popular article read 600+ times.
About this journal
Aims and scope:
Magnetic Resonance Insights is an international, open access peer reviewed journal which covers all aspects of the development and use of magnetic resonance. This includes all levels of basic and applied research, as well as all aspects of clinical research and applications in biology. As an open access journal, it provides a means for researchers and clinicians in the many different fields involved in magnetic resonance to communicate their ideas quickly and without barriers. Work on related experimental techniques, equipment, theory, results, procedures and methods is also welcome.
Editorial standards and procedures:
Submissions, excluding editorials, letters to the editor and dedications, will be peer reviewed by two reviewers. Reviewers are required to provide fair, balanced and constructive reports.
Under our Fairness in Peer Review Policy authors may appeal against reviewers' recommendations which are ill-founded, unobjective or unfair. Appeals are considered by the Editor in Chief or Associate Editor.
Papers are not sent to peer reviewers following submission of a revised manuscript. Editorial decisions on re-submitted papers are based on the author's response to the initial peer review report.
Indexing:
This journal is indexed by:
- DOAJ
National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy compliant:
As of April 7 2008, the US NIH Public Access Policy requires that all peer reviewed articles resulting from research carried out with NIH funding be deposited in the Pubmed Central archive.
If you are an NIH employee or grantee Libertas Academica will ensure that you comply with the policy by depositing your paper at Pubmed Central on your behalf.
Call for papers:
The Editor in Chief welcomes submissions. Submissions of the following types are invited:
- Original research articles.
- Reviews: comprehensive, authoritative, descriptions of any subject within the journal's scope. They may cover basic science and clinical reviews, ethics, pro/con debates, and equipment reviews.
- Commentaries: focused and opinionated articles on any subject within the journal's scope. These articles are usually related to a contemporary issue.
- Hypotheses: articles that present an original hypothesis backed solely by previously published results rather than any new evidence. They should outline significant progress in thinking that would also be testable.
- Letters to the Editor: these can be either a re-analysis of a previously published article, or a response to such a re-analysis from the authors of the original publication.
- Methodology articles: these discuss a new experimental method, test or procedure. The article must describe a demonstrable advance on what is currently available. The method needs to have been well tested and ideally, but not necessarily, used in a way that proves its value.
- Short reports: brief reports of data from original research.
- Meeting reports: a report pertaining to activity at a meeting or conference Articles published in this journal are immediately available without delay upon publication and enjoy substantial visibility.
All submissions are subject to prompt, objective and fair peer review in compliance with our Fairness in Peer Review Policy. Copyright in published articles remains with the author(s). Authors are continually informed of the progress of their paper and our staff are friendly and responsive.
One author recently wrote: "I would like to say that this is the most author-friendly editing process I have experienced in over 150 publications. Thank you most sincerely."
Criteria for publication:
Publication is dependent on peer reviewers' judgement of papers. Reviewers are asked to provide thoughtful and unbiased feedback to authors to ensure that the conclusions of papers are valid and manuscripts achieve reasonable standards of scholarliness and intelligibility.
Previous work in the field must be acknowledged and papers should read without unreasonable difficulty. Papers should fit comfortably within the scope of the journal.
Reviewers are asked to act in a fair, objective and constructive manner which maintains quality standards and helps authors to communicate their research. They are instructed that in areas of genuinely novel research issues may be raised which cannot immediately be resolved and that absolutely rigorous validation of data may therefore not be possible.
More information on the role of peer reviewers is available on the information for reviewers page. Where authors consider that reviewers have made recommendations which are unreasonable, unobjective or ill-founded they may appeal them to the Editor in Chief or Associate Editor under our Fairness in Peer Review Policy.
Articles submitted to other journals:
We are willing to consider papers which have been peer reviewed by other journals but not accepted for publication.
Services for authors:
Prior to peer review of your paper we can:
- Have your paper's reference style revised to meet our requirements,
- Have your paper's English revised by specialist English-speaking technical editors.
After peer review of your paper we can:
- Have your paper revised in accordance with peer reviewer's recommendations and have a summary of responses to the reviewers created by our specialist external substantive editors,
- Provide bound reprints of your article in colour or black and white ,
- Provide online-early rapid publication if your paper prior to typesetting.
What other authors have said:
Libertas Academica actively requests, receives and acts upon feedback from authors, readers and editorial boards. Here's what some recent authors have said about us:
"Within a couple of days the reviewers had been procured and the manuscript was out."
"The communication between your staff and me has been terrific. Whenever progress is made with the manuscript, I receive notice. Quite honestly, I've never had such complete communication with a journal."
"LA is different, and hopefully represents a kind of scientific publication machinery that removes the hurdles from free flow of scientific thought."
Article processing fees:
All submissions to this journal are subject to an article processing fee if they are accepted for publication. Article processing fees are used to fund the processing of your paper and development of the journal. Article processing fees are the only compulsory charge you will face and do not vary according to word count, page count, colour figures or any other factor. There is no additional charge for the author(s) to make any use of their article and no charge to readers to access it.
Full fee waivers are available for authors working in undeveloped nations and partial discounts of 20-50% are available to authors in other nations. Authors must be able to verifiably demonstrate their suitability for a discount or waiver. Availability of waivers and discounts is subject to monthly availability and is given at the publisher's discretion. Waivers and discounts must be applied for prior to submission. Neither are available after submission.
Register as a peer reviewer:
Do you wish to register as a peer reviewer? Or are you already a registered peer reviewer but you need to update your contact details? To register or update your details visit the peer reviewer registration form.
Applicants must be able to demonstrate at least five years of continuous experience in the journal's subject area including at least two in the previous 24 months.
This journal has been accepted for indexing in DOAJ.
New call for papers sent to newsletter subscribers in week 10 2009. Readers who wish to be elligible to receive CFPs should subscribe to the newsletter.
Peer reviewers are sought. Click here to apply or to update your details.
Check the Publisher's Blog for recent news
Iterative Decomposition of Water and Fat with Echo Asymmetric and Least—Squares Estimation (IDEAL) (Reeder et al. 2005) Automated Spine Survey Iterative Scan Technique (ASSIST) (Weiss et al. 2006)
Kenneth L. Weiss1, Dongmei Sun1,2, Rebecca S. Cornelius1 and Jane L. Weiss3
1University of Cincinnati, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A. 2Beijing Jiaotong University, Institute of Information Science, Beijing, P.R. China. 3WestImage, Division of Research, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Multi-parametric MRI of the entire spine is technologist-dependent, time consuming, and often limited by inhomogeneous fat suppression. We tested a technique to provide rapid automated total spine MRI screening with improved tissue contrast through optimized fat-water separation.
Methods: The entire spine was auto-imaged in two contiguous 35 cm field of view (FOV) sagittal stations, utilizing out-of-phase fast gradient echo (FGRE) and T1 and/or T2 weighted fast spin echo (FSE) IDEAL (Iterative Decomposition of Water and Fat with Echo Asymmetric and Least-squares Estimation) sequences. 18 subjects were studied, one twice at 3.0T (pre and post contrast) and one at both 1.5 T and 3.0T for a total of 20 spine examinations (8 at 1.5 T and 12 at 3.0T). Images were independently evaluated by two neuroradiologists and run through Automated Spine Survey Iterative Scan Technique (ASSIST) analysis software for automated vertebral numbering.
Results: In all 20 total spine studies, neuroradiologist and computer ASSIST labeling were concordant. In all cases, IDEAL provided uniform fat and water separation throughout the entire 70 cm FOV imaged. Two subjects demonstrated breast metastases and one had a large presumptive schwannoma. 14 subjects demonstrated degenerative disc disease with associated Modic Type I or II changes at one or more levels. FGRE ASSIST afforded subminute submillimeter in-plane resolution of the entire spine with high contrast between discs and vertebrae at both 1.5 and 3.0T. Marrow signal abnormalities could be particularly well characterized with IDEAL derived images and parametric maps.
Conclusion: IDEAL ASSIST is a promising MRI technique affording a rapid automated high resolution, high contrast survey of the entire spine with optimized tissue characterization.
Readers of this also read:
- Iterative Decomposition of Water and Fat with Echo Asymmetric and Least—Squares Estimation (IDEAL) (Reeder et al. 2005) Automated Spine Survey Iterative Scan Technique (ASSIST) (Weiss et al. 2006)
- Introductory Editorial (Magnetic Resonance Insights)
- Introductory Editorial (Magnetic Resonance Insights)
- Contraceptive Options for the Perimenopausal Woman
- Surgical Anatomy of Large Retroperitoneal Teratomas in Infants: Report of Two Cases
- 23/Jan/2009
Preclinical MRI and NMR Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease: Concepts and Applications
- 03/Nov/2008
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Spectroscopy (MRS) in Breast Cancer
- 30/Oct/2008
Dancing with the Electrons: Time-Domain and CW In Vivo EPR Imaging
- 24/Sep/2008
Coherence Transfer in Spatially Resolved NMR
- 16/Sep/2008
Gender Differences in Musculoskeletal Lipid Metabolism as Assessed by Localized Two-Dimensional Correlation Spectroscopy
- 03/Sep/2008
Clinical Applications of Diffusion Tensor Imaging
- 02/Sep/2008
Iterative Decomposition of Water and Fat with Echo Asymmetric and Least—Squares Estimation (IDEAL) (Reeder et al. 2005) Automated Spine Survey Iterative Scan Technique (ASSIST) (Weiss et al. 2006)
- 25/Jul/2008
Introductory Editorial (Magnetic Resonance Insights)
- 02/Apr/2008