A Comprehensive Analysis of Gene Expression Evolution Between Humans and Mice
Yupeng Wang1 and Romdhane Rekaya1, 2, 3
1Department of Animal and Dairy science, 2Institute of Bioinformatics, 3Department of Statistics, University of Georgia Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Abstract
Evolutionary changes in gene expression account for most phenotypic differences between species. Advances in microarray technology have made the systematic study of gene expression evolution possible. In this study, gene expression patterns were compared between human and mouse genomes using two published methods. Specifically, we studied how gene expression evolution was related to GO terms and tried to decode the relationship between promoter evolution and gene expression evolution. The results showed that (1) the significant enrichment of biological processes in orthologs of expression conservation reveals functional significance of gene expression conservation. The more conserved gene expression in some biological processes than is expected in a purely neutral model reveals negative selection on gene expression. However, fast evolving genes mainly support the neutrality of gene expression evolution, and (2) gene expression conservation is positively but only slightly correlated with promoter conservation based on a motif-count score of the promoter alignment. Our results suggest a neutral model with negative selection for gene expression evolution between humans and mice, and promoter evolution could have some effects on gene expression evolution.
Readers of this also read:
- A Comprehensive Analysis of Gene Expression Evolution Between Humans and Mice
- Mammoth and Elephant Phylogenetic Relationships: Mammut Americanum, the Missing Outgroup
- Mammoth and Elephant Phylogenetic Relationships: Mammut Americanum, the Missing Outgroup
- Linguistic Processing and Classification of Semi Structured Bibliographic Data on Complementary Medicine
- On the Use of Bootstrapped Topologies in Coalescent-Based Bayesian MCMC Inference: A Comparison of Estimation and Computational Efficiencies