Close
Help




JOURNAL

Palliative Care: Research and Treatment

Multidisciplinary Prognostication Using the Palliative Prognostic Score in an Australian Cancer Center

Submit a Paper


Palliative Care: Research and Treatment 2015:9 7-14

Original Research

Published on 02 Aug 2015

DOI: 10.4137/PCRT.S24411


Further metadata provided in PDF



Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Palliative Care: Research and Treatment

Abstract

Context: Accurate prognostication is important in oncology and palliative care. A multidisciplinary approach to prognostication provides a novel approach, but its accuracy and application is poorly researched. In this study, we describe and analyze our experience of multidisciplinary prognostication in palliative care patients with cancer.

Objectives: To assess our accuracy of prognostication using multidisciplinary team prediction of survival (MTPS) alone and within the Palliative Prognostic (PaP) Score.

Methods: This retrospective study included all new patients referred to a palliative care consultation service in a tertiary cancer center between January 2010 and December 2011. Initial assessment data for 421 inpatients and 223 outpatients were analyzed according to inpatient and outpatient groups to evaluate the accuracy of prognostication using MTPS alone and within the PaP score (MTPS-PaP) and their correlation with overall survival.

Results: Inpatients with MTPS-PaP group A, B, and C had a median survival of 10.9, 3.4, and 0.7 weeks, respectively, and a 30-day survival probability of 81%, 40%, and 10%, respectively. Outpatients with MTPS-PaP group A and B had a median survival of 17.3 and 5.1 weeks, respectively, and a 30-day survival probability of 94% and 50%, respectively. MTPS overestimated survival by a factor of 1.5 for inpatients and 1.2 for outpatients. The MTPS-PaP score correlated better than MTPS alone with overall survival.

Conclusion: This study suggests that a multidisciplinary team approach to prognostication within routine clinical practice is possible and may substitute for single clinician prediction of survival within the PaP score without detracting from its accuracy. Multidisciplinary team prognostication can assist treating teams to recognize and articulate prognosis, facilitate treatment decisions, and plan end-of-life care appropriately. PaP was less useful in the outpatient setting, given the longer survival interval of the outpatient palliative care patient group.



Downloads

PDF  (1.53 MB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing


What Your Colleagues Say About Palliative Care: Research and Treatment
This is the second time I have submitted a paper to Palliative Care: Research and Treatment for possible publication.  In both instances, my experience with Libertas Academica was very good from submission to acceptance.  The peer reviewers' comments were insightful, very constructive, and extremely helpful.  The author interface was user-friendly.  The publishing process was fast and convenient. I highly recommend this journal.
Dr Liza Manalo (Palliative Care Unit, Cancer Center, The Medical City, Pasig City, Philippines)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube