Close
Help




JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Ear, Nose and Throat

FDG-PET/CT in the Assessment of Treatment Response after Oncologic Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Submit a Paper


Clinical Medicine Insights: Ear, Nose and Throat 2014:7 25-29

Original Research

Published on 19 Aug 2014

DOI: 10.4137/CMENT.S16399


Further metadata provided in PDF



Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Ear, Nose and Throat

Abstract

Background: In many centers, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) is used to monitor treatment response after definitive (chemo)radiotherapy [(C)RT] for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), but its usefulness remains somewhat controversial. We aimed at assessing the accuracy of FDG-PET/CT in detecting residual disease after (C)RT.

Method: All HNSCC patients with FDG-PET/CT performed to assess treatment response 10–18 weeks after definitive (C)RT at our institution during 2008–2010 were included. The patient charts were reviewed for FDG-PET/CT findings, histopathologic findings, and follow-up data. The median follow-up time for FDG-PET/CT negative patients was 26 months.

Results: Eighty-eight eligible patients were identified. The stage distribution was as follows: I, n = 1; II, n = 15; III, n = 17; IV, n = 55. The negative predictive value, positive predictive value, specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT in detecting residual disease were 87%, 81%, 94%, 65%, and 85%, respectively. The corresponding specific figures for the primary tumor site were 91%, 71%, 94%, 59%, and 86% and for the neck 93%, 100%, 100%, 75%, and 94%, respectively.

Conclusions: In patients who have received definitive (C)RT for HNSCC, post-treatment FDG-PET/CT has good potential to guide clinical deci-sion-making. Patients with negative scan can safely be followed up clinically only, while positive scan necessitates tissue biopsies or a neck dissection to rule out residual disease.



Downloads

PDF  (704.55 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)

XML

PMC HTML


Sharing


What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Ear, Nose and Throat
The experience of publishing with Clinical Medicine Insights: Ear, Nose and Throat was amazing. The prompt review and author friendly system made the process very simple and fast. The best part was the meticulous guidance provided by the editor in every step of the publication.  I am very happy to be associated with such a dedicated and thoroughly professional team. I would certainly recommend others to submit their works to this journal and experience the ...
Dr Preetam Chappity (Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube