Close
Help




JOURNAL

Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology

Endoscopic Needle Knife Precut Papillotomy for Inaccessible Bile Duct Following Failed Pancreatic Duct Access

Submit a Paper


Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology 2009:2 1-5

Published on 16 Dec 2008


Further metadata provided in PDF



Sign up for email alerts to receive notifications of new articles published in Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the safety, effectiveness, success rate and complications of needle knife precut papillotomy for inaccessible bile duct after failed pancreatic ducts access.

Methods: Selective common bile duct cannulation was required for 582 patients from November 2004 to May 2008. Precut sphincterotomy was performed in 28 patients (16 male, 12 female; mean age 71). When standard bile duct cannulation was unsuccessful after more than 20 minutes, the bile duct was considered inaccessible. Group A consisted of patients where pancreatic duct access was possible and transpancreatic papillary septotomy was performed (20 patients). If pancreatic duct cannulation also failed, needle knife precut method was performed and these patients belonged to group B (8 patients). The success and complication rates of the two groups were compared using the Chi-square test.

Results: The success rates were 85% and 87.5% respectively. Of the 28 patients in group A, 6 had mild to moderate pancreatitis and one patient had mild bleeding. The complication rates were 35% and 0% respectively and the differences were not significant.

Conclusion: Needle knife precut papillotomy is useful and acceptable in patients after failed pancreatic duct access.



Downloads

PDF  (200.16 KB PDF FORMAT)

RIS citation   (ENDNOTE, REFERENCE MANAGER, PROCITE, REFWORKS)

BibTex citation   (BIBDESK, LATEX)


Sharing


What Your Colleagues Say About Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology
I had a really positive experience publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights: Gastroenterology.  The submission process is easy and friendly.  The review process is very accurate with a considerable quantity of reviewers who give helpful and reasonable suggestions.  The staff are professional and gives prompt email responses.  I recommend colleagues to consider publishing with Libertas Academica.
Dr Vincenzo Neri (University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy)
More Testimonials

Quick Links


New article and journal news notification services
Email Alerts RSS Feeds
Facebook Google+ Twitter
Pinterest Tumblr YouTube